Breaking News
BCB official calls former Bangladesh captain Tamim Iqbal ‘Indian agent’ amid Mustafizur Rahman row; triggers protest from players | Cricket News

[ad_1]

BCB official calls former Bangladesh captain Tamim Iqbal 'Indian agent' amid Mustafizur Rahman row; triggers protest from players
Mustafizur Rahman; Tamim Iqbal

A senior Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) official’s comment calling former captain Tamim Iqbal “an Indian agent” has drawn criticism from players in the country. Tamim, one of Bangladesh’s leading openers, had advised the BCB not to be driven by emotion while deciding on the national team’s participation in the T20 World Cup in India. Nazmul, chairman of the BCB finance committee, made the remark in a Facebook post.

Bangladesh seek T20 WC match shift from India after Mustafizur Rahman’s IPL exit

“This time, the people of Bangladesh witnessed, with their own eyes, the emergence of yet another proven Indian agent,” he wrote. The post received immediate backlash from former and current cricketers, including Taskin Ahmed, Mominul Haque, and Taijul Islam. The Cricketers’ Welfare Association of Bangladesh (CWAB) also expressed concern. “A comment made by BCB director M Nazmul Islam regarding former national captain Tamim Iqbal has come to the attention of the Cricketers’ Welfare Association of Bangladesh. We are stunned, shocked, and outraged by it. Such a remark by a board official about the most successful opener in Bangladesh’s history, who represented the country for 16 years, is utterly condemnable.” “Not only because it concerns a player like Tamim, but such comments about any cricketer of the country are unacceptable and insulting to the entire cricketing community,” the players’ body said in a statement. The 36-year-old Tamim played 70 Tests, 243 ODIs, and 78 T20 Internationals for Bangladesh. “We strongly protest against this comment. When a responsible board director makes such remarks on a public platform, it also raises serious questions about the code of conduct of board officials,” CWAB said. “We have already submitted a protest letter to the BCB president, demanding a public apology from the concerned board director and that he be brought under accountability. We hope the BCB president will take appropriate action as soon as possible,” the statement added. Bangladesh had written to the International Cricket Council requesting their T20 World Cup games be moved out of India after the BCCI asked IPL franchise Kolkata Knight Riders to release Mustafizur Rahman ahead of the 2026 edition. “Cricket is the life of Bangladesh. A recent comment surrounding a former national captain who has made a major contribution to the game has caused many to reflect,” said pacer Taskin. “I believe that such remarks directed at a former cricketer of the country are not helpful in the interest of Bangladesh cricket. I hope the concerned authorities will consider the matter seriously and adopt a more responsible stance in the future,” he added. In 2007, Tamim’s half-century had helped Bangladesh eliminate India from the ODI World Cup in the Caribbean. Former Bangladesh captain Mominul said Nazmul’s remarks were unacceptable. “The comment made by BCB director M Nazmul Islam regarding former national captain Tamim Iqbal is completely unacceptable and insulting to the country’s cricketing community. Such behaviour towards a cricketer is in direct conflict with the board’s responsibility and ethics,” Mominul said. “A senior cricketer was not given even the minimum respect; instead, he was deliberately humiliated in public. Such remarks show a lack of even basic decorum regarding where and how to speak while holding such a high responsibility. “I strongly condemn this comment and firmly demand a public apology from the concerned director and that he be brought under accountability. I call upon the BCB to take swift and strict action,” he added.

[ad_2]

Source link

Ayodhya bans non-veg delivery within Ram temple’s 15km radius | India News

[ad_1]

Ayodhya bans non-veg delivery within Ram temple's 15km radius

AYODHYA: The Ayodhya administration has banned the delivery of non-vegetarian food in a radius of 15 kilometres of the Ram temple, following “complaints that food delivery companies are supplying non-veg food in the periphery of Ayodhya town that is marked under ‘paanch kosi parikrama’ area”. A warning has also been issued to hotels and homestays in Ayodhya town that were reportedly serving non-vegetarian food and alcoholic drinks to their guests. Ayodhya assistant food commissioner Manik Chandra Singh said, “We received complaints that despite a previously imposed ban, non-vegetarian food was being served to tourists through online orders. Following this, a ban was imposed on online non-vegetarian deliveries as well.” “All hotels, shopkeepers and delivery companies have been informed of the ban order. Continuous monitoring would be done by the administration to ensure compliance,” Ayodhya assistant food commissioner said. ]However, over two dozen licensed liquor shops still exist on the Ram Path despite a motion adopted by Ayodhya municipal corporation (AMC) last May to ban the sale of liquor and meat on the 14-kilometre stretch of Ram Path. An AMC official said, “We have tried to remove the meat shops on Ram Path even in Faizabad city, but for removing liquor shops from Ram Path, we have to take permission from the district administration.”

[ad_2]

Source link

New twist to Ambernath tale: NCP dumps BJP, backs Sena | India News

[ad_1]

New twist to Ambernath tale: NCP dumps BJP, backs Sena

AMBERNATH: In a fresh twist to the political drama in the Ambernath municipal council, a day after 12 suspended Congress councillors joined BJP, all four councillors from the Ajit Pawar-led NCP withdrew their support to the BJP-led front and extended it to the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena. With this, Sena, which had emerged the single-largest party by winning 27 seats, now has the support of 32 councillors (one backer is an independent), a majority in the 60-member council. The latest move is a setback to an attempt by BJP, with 15 councillors, to gain a majority by first securing the support of 12 Congress and 4 NCP councillors and then taking the suspended Congress councillors into its own fold.

.

BJP had won the direct election to the post of council president but will now be compelled to share power with Shiv Sena as key positions such as that of deputy president and posts of chairpersons of local committees are expected to go to Sena and NCP, political observers said. The elections held last month saw Shiv Sena, BJP and NCP contest separately. Ambernath has traditionally been a Shiv Sena stronghold and is also considered the bastion of Shiv Sena LS MP Shrikant Shinde, son of deputy CM Eknath Shinde. To maintain control of the civic body, BJP had brought together 12 Congress councillors, four from NCP, and one independent, forming the 32-member Ambernath Vikas Aghadi. The group was formally registered with Thane collector. However, BJP faced criticism for aligning with Congress, and the latter subsequently suspended its councillors, leading all 12 to formally join the saffron outfit. However, Shinde Junior is said to have turned the tables on BJP by securing the support of the four NCP councillors plus one independent. Two independents were elected to the council; the other is with the BJP-led group. Sena MLA Balaji Kinikar confirmed Friday’s developments. A BJP politician who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the four NCP councillors had formally joined the Ambernath Vikas Aghadi, and the group was recognised by the Thane collector. This, he said, raises questions over whether the NCP councillors can extend support to Sena. Observers said the changing political equations have altered the balance of power in the council but may have also opened the door to possible legal and political challenges in the days ahead.

[ad_2]

Source link

Reality different, says Supreme Court as activists argue for stray dogs | India News

[ad_1]

Reality different, says Supreme Court as activists argue for stray dogs

NEW DELHI: As animal rights activists submitted that stray dogs need not be removed from premises of public institutions like hospitals and colleges as they are not a threat to humans and that both can live peacefully, Supreme Court on Friday said the picture projected by them in favour of the canines is different from ground realities. Seeking rollback of SC’s order to make these premises free of strays, a lawyer told a bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and N V Anjaria that recently a picture showing a dog walking along with monks across the US went viral while, in another recent case, a dog came to the rescue of a toddler. The bench, however, said cases of dog bites give a different picture. “We will tell you the reality at the end of the arguments,” the bench said. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for NGO ‘All Creatures Great and Small’, urged the court to involve domain experts, as was done in the Aravali case.Stray dogs: NGO asks SC to involve expertsThe obligation of the court to enforce rights is in the absence of legislation. The court will be building a new edifice if you enter into that territory,” Singhvi told the bench. “While our amicus is great, the concept of amici are basically law advisers. They are not domain experts. The court must have domain experts along with the amicus. In the recent Aravali judgment, the reconsideration was because that committee had 90% bureaucrats – generalists, not domain experts. Reconsideration was done because the domain experts had to come in. It will improve the quality of court orders,” Singhvi said. SC has said it would give a hearing to whoever files an application in the matter. Over the past three days, the hearing has spanned for six-and-half-hours and the court has heard the views of 20 individuals and NGOs. It will resume on Tuesday.

[ad_2]

Source link

IAS officer out of town, home burgled in South Delhi | India News

[ad_1]

IAS officer out of town, home burgled in South Delhi

NEW DELHI: An IAS officer’s home in south Delhi’s Greater Kailash Enclave-II was allegedly burgled, with valuables worth around Rs 60 lakh stolen. The officer was not in the city at the time of the incident and reported it to the police on Friday. According to police, a PCR call regarding the theft was received in the afternoon. A police team from the Chittaranjan Park police station went to the spot, where thecaller, a resident of Block-E, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, was present. During a preliminary enquiry, he told police that the house belonged to his uncle, a senior IAS officer, who was away from Delhi following the death of his son. He said that when he visited the house, he found the main gate open, which he found suspicious. “On entering the premises, he found that all the doors were open and household articles lying scattered, clearly indicating a theft,” a senior police officer said, adding that he then informed the police. Sources said the stolen articles included jewellery, cash and other valuables, with the total value estimated at around Rs 60 lakh. Police said the exact value of the stolen property was still being assessed. An FIR has been registered and further investigation is underway.

[ad_2]

Source link

Army soldier dies during night patrol in Baramulla | India News

[ad_1]

Army soldier dies during night patrol in Baramulla

SRINAGAR: A soldier serving with 46 Rashtriya Rifles died after slipping while on night patrol in north Kashmir’s Baramulla district, Army said Friday.The soldier, posted at Fatehgarh Sheeri camp, slipped and lost consciousness Thursday. He was rushed to Govt Medical College, Baramulla, where doctors declared him dead on arrival. The soldier hailed from Haryana.

[ad_2]

Source link

India outlook: Reforms put wind in its sails amid global headwinds; PMO’s Shaktikanta Das maps the road ahead

[ad_1]

India outlook: Reforms put wind in its sails amid global headwinds; PMO’s Shaktikanta Das maps the road ahead

India is at the cusp of a historic economic journey, with government policies and reforms giving the country “wind in its sails” even as global trade uncertainties intensify, Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister Shaktikanta Das said on Friday.Delivering the inaugural Bibek Debroy Memorial Lecture, Das said India has emerged stronger from successive global shocks and is now positioned to pursue sustained growth despite a fragmented global economic order, PTI reported.Atmanirbharta as resilience, not isolation“At a time when the consensus that powered globalisation in past decades has frayed and multilateral cooperation has become harder to achieve, India has embraced Atmanirbharta as the overarching principle of our policies,” Das said.Clarifying the approach, he added: “Atmanirbharta is not being isolationist, but a strategy to build core competence and resilience. Economic Atmanirbharta means developing the capacity to produce critical goods and technologies at home and reducing over-reliance on foreign sources.”A self-reliant economy, backed by strong domestic capabilities and an autonomous foreign policy, provides India greater strength to sustain growth and navigate external challenges, he said. “Together, they ensure that India’s rise is resilient, sustainable and beneficial to us and to the world.”From global shocks to ‘wind in our sails’Das said India has successfully emerged from what appeared to be “perfect storms” triggered by multiple global shocks since the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020.“And now with the policies that the country has adopted, the wind is in our sails. We are indeed on our path to Viksit Bharat,” he said.India, he noted, stands at an inflection point where shifting geopolitical alignments and trade policies are reshaping the global economic landscape.“India stands today at the cusp of a historic journey — from being an incredible India to a credible India. There will be headwinds and challenges emanating from known and unknown sources,” Das said.Fragmenting world, India’s strategic responseDas flagged the strain on global institutions and multilateral frameworks, saying traditional multilateralism is increasingly being sidelined by geopolitical rivalries, protectionism and fragmentation.“Key international institutions are struggling to deliver on their mandates… Trade and supply chains, once seen as neutral conduits of globalisation, are increasingly being utilised as instrumentalities of disruption and dominance,” he said.Reshoring, friend-shoring and restricted technology flows are fragmenting global networks, reflecting broader geo-economic fragmentation, Das added.Against this backdrop, India’s approach is pragmatic. “India stands for a cooperative and rules-based global system; but at the same time, we are proactively forging partnerships and strategies to secure our national interest in a world where power is more diffused,” he said.“We, of course, acknowledge that the multilateral system must be revitalised, even as we adapt to new alignments,” Das added.

[ad_2]

Source link

India–US trade talks: Did a missed Modi–Trump call stall the deal? GTRI flags deeper policy gaps

[ad_1]

India–US trade talks: Did a missed Modi–Trump call stall the deal? GTRI flags deeper policy gaps

A remark by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick blaming the lack of a personal phone call from PM Narendra Modi for the stalled India–US trade deal does not stand up to scrutiny and diverts attention from substantive policy differences, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said in a report released on Friday.In an interview on the All-In Podcast on January 8, Lutnick said the long-pending trade agreement failed to materialise because Prime Minister Modi did not personally call then US President Donald Trump to close the negotiations. According to Lutnick, by the time Modi agreed to make the call, the US had already moved on to concluding trade deals with Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, leaving India out of that sequence.However, GTRI noted that while the US did conclude agreements with those countries around July 2025, India–US trade negotiations continued well beyond that period. The report pointed out that multiple official-level engagements on market access, tariffs and regulatory issues took place after those deals were signed, undermining the claim that Washington had already decided there would be “no deal” with India at that stage.“If the absence of a leader-level phone call had decisively ended the negotiations in mid-2025, there would have been little reason for both sides to continue talks for months thereafter,” the report said, calling Lutnick’s explanation more of a retrospective justification than a contemporaneous reason.GTRI also said framing the impasse as a failure of personal diplomacy misunderstands how large trade agreements are concluded. Such deals hinge on convergence over policy issues including tariffs, agriculture, digital trade and regulatory autonomy, rather than symbolic gestures between leaders, it noted.The report concluded that the prolonged delay in the India–US trade deal reflects unresolved structural and policy disagreements rather than a missed phone call, warning that oversimplifying the issue risks trivialising one of the most significant trade relationships in the global economy.

[ad_2]

Source link

Another Maduro-style operation? ‘Be prepared’: Iran’s exiled prince issues ‘urgent’ call for Trump

[ad_1]

Another Maduro-style operation? 'Be prepared': Iran's exiled prince issues 'urgent' call for Trump

Iran’s exiled crown prince Reza Pahlavi has issued an urgent appeal to US President Donald Trump to intervene as mass protests sweep the Islamic Republic.“Mr President, this is an urgent and immediate call for your attention, support and action,” Pahlavi wrote on social media. “Please be prepared to intervene to help the people of Iran.The call came as protests escalated across Tehran and other cities, initially driven by Iran’s collapsing economy but now posing one of the most serious challenges to the Islamic Republic in years. Demonstrators chanted slogans including “Death to the dictator” and, in some cases, praised the former monarchy — a striking shift in a country where such support once carried the death penalty.Iran’s leadership responded with threats of force. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused protesters of acting to “please the president of the United States”, dismissing Trump as having hands “stained with the blood of Iranians”. Iran’s judiciary chief warned punishment would be “decisive, maximum and without any legal leniency”, as state media labelled demonstrators “terrorists”.At least 62 people have been killed and more than 2,300 detained, according to rights groups, amid a sweeping internet blackout that activists say is being used to conceal a violent crackdown.Trump has repeatedly warned Tehran against killing peaceful protesters, saying Iran would “pay hell” if it does. The warning has taken on added weight after US forces seized a fifth sanctioned oil tanker this week as part of a broader effort to control Venezuelan exports following Maduro’s removal — an operation that has sharpened speculation about whether Washington could apply similar pressure elsewhere.Pahlavi, who has lived in exile for nearly five decades, insists the blackout is being used “to murder these young heroes”. Yet it remains unclear how much genuine support he commands inside Iran, or whether protesters are backing a return of the monarchy — or simply demanding an end to clerical rule.Pahlavi’s call for intervention comes days after after the United States captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight operation in Caracas.

[ad_2]

Source link

Sensex, Nifty down over 2% in just 5 sessions: All eyes on US Supreme Court ruling on Trump tariffs – what will it mean for markets?

[ad_1]

Sensex, Nifty down over 2% in just 5 sessions: All eyes on US Supreme Court ruling on Trump tariffs - what will it mean for markets?
Investors are anticipating that the decision could either trigger a sharp surge in the Sensex and Nifty or exacerbate the turbulence. (AI image)

Will the world continue to face US President Donald Trump tariffs or will the Supreme Court in America deem them illegal? It’s an important factor in the minds of investors world over, and Indian stock markets are also awaiting clarity on the same. While it was widely anticipated that the Supreme Court in the US will rule on the tariff issue on Friday, no ruling is lined up for today.For the past five trading sessions, Sensex and Nifty have tanked over 2% – the markets are reacting to a stalemate in the India-US trade deal negotiations, a fresh threat by Trump of higher tariffs on India, and a new bill in the US Senate which proposes 500% tariffs on countries that purchase Russian crude oil.

Trump Clears Russia Sanctions Bill, 500% Tariff Threat Looms As India Reworks Oil Import Strategy

Investors are anticipating that the decision could either trigger a sharp surge in the Sensex and Nifty or exacerbate the turbulence that has already unsettled Dalal Street in the last few days.

Ruling on Trump tariffs: What would it mean for Sensex, Nifty?

Should the Supreme Court strike down the tariffs, India could emerge as one of the main beneficiaries in the world. India currently faces a 50% tariff rate on its exports to the US. However, the recent nod by Trump for a bill that looks to impose a 500% tariff on countries importing Russian oil poses an additional threat to India’s trade competitiveness. Experts widely expect the stock market to rally in case a verdict striking down the tariffs comes.Dr. V K Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments Limited says, “The US Supreme Court ruling can have profound consequences. How the ruling will impact markets will depend on the details. If the ruling is that the tariffs are illegal and the president has exceeded his authority, that will lead to serious consequences like refunding the importers who have paid the tariffs. This will widen the US deficit and increase their borrowing leading to higher bond yields. The impact of this scenario on the US stock market will be negative.”“On the contrary, countries like India which have been at the receiving end of Trump’s tariffs will benefit from such a ruling. Particularly exporters to the US will benefit. It is also possible that the Supreme Court may partially nullify the tariffs, in which case, the impact will depend on the details. Even if the ruling goes against the US administration, it is highly likely that the president and his team will resort to other means to impose tariffs. The tariff drama is likely to linger for some time,” he tells TOI.A Supreme Court decision invalidating the Trump-era tariffs could offer immediate support to global risk assets, with Indian equities standing to gain the most. Analysts note that such a ruling would lower input costs, ease trade tensions, and enhance profit visibility for export-driven sectors that have been heavily impacted by the high US duties.On the other hand, if the court upholds the tariffs, markets may experience prolonged volatility and heightened policy uncertainty. Sustained tariffs would maintain elevated supply chain costs, squeeze corporate margins, and potentially delay investment decisions. Under such conditions, experts anticipate a lack of broad market gains, with trading largely limited to individual stocks.

The 500% Tariff Sword

Market participants are also going to closely monitor not just the verdict, but its specifics: whether the court will deliver a full invalidation of the tariff regime or a partial ruling that allows some trade frictions to persist.The Russia Sanctioning Act could impose a staggering 500% tariff on nations importing Russian oil. While the measure is intended to restrict Moscow’s energy revenues, it could inflict severe collateral consequences on India.“The trade dispute between India and the US has intensified, with former President Donald Trump endorsing legislation authored by Senator Lindsey Graham that would allow a 500% tariff on countries importing Russian oil,” said Harsimran Sahni, Head – Treasury at Anand Rathi Global Finance.Since the onset of the Ukraine conflict, India has significantly increased imports of discounted Russian crude. Sahni cautioned, “If enforced, this tariff could sharply elevate the cost of Indian exports to the US, hurting trade competitiveness and straining an already fragile global economic environment.”He added, “The implications for India extend beyond trade alone. Higher tariffs could slow growth by impacting export-driven sectors, while rising energy costs might complicate inflation management. Government measures to stabilize supply and demand could affect liquidity and drive yields higher.”

[ad_2]

Source link