Former Kansas City Chiefs player Darron Lee’s disturbing domestic violence history comes back into focus amid murder charge.(Image via GoFundMe, Getty Images)

Darron Lee, the former New York Jets and Kansas City Chiefs’ player, had a lot going on in his career when he decided to distance himself from the league in 2020.While Darron Lee faces first degree murder charges for allegedly brutally killing his girlfriend, Gabriella Carvalho Perpétuo, a domestic violence case against him has resurfaced as it paints a horrifying picture of what went down.

Darron Lee’s serious domestic violence charges resurface amid the alleged murder of his girlfriend

According to NBC 4, Darron Lee was accused of physically violent against an unnamed woman whom he had assaulted at night on 3rd April, 2023.Later in the morning, when the victim asked Darron Lee to leave her bedroom, it resulted in an altercation where, as per police reports, he “threw her against the wall and to the ground”.As per NBC 4, when the young woman was on the ground, Darron Lee allegedly punched her several times and pulled her hair.Two women who were also at the same house later came up to rescue the victim and a police complaint was filed against the former NFL player, Darron Lee.While a warrant for his arrest was issued when he failed to appear in court in June 2023, it is not publicly known what happened to the domestic violence charges against him.Unfortunately, this was not the first time that the former New York Jets player was accused of domestic violence. In 2022, another woman filed a case against him after he “picked her up by the neck and threw her to the ground”.While it has been a few years since these horrific crimes, Darron Lee’s recent alleged crime has sparked shockwaves across the league.Once a promising player who won the Super Bowl with the Kansas City Chiefs in 2019 has now turned into an alleged murderer.

What happened to Darron Lee’s girlfriend?

For the unversed, on 5th February, Darron Lee’s girlfriend, Gabriella Carvalho Perpétuo, was found dead by authorities.While Darron Lee tried to maintain his innocence by claiming that she tripped in the bathroom, authorities soon found serious injuries on her body.This included bite marks on her thigh, stab wounds to her stomach and serious head injuries.At this point in time, Darron Lee has been denied bail and is all set to appear for his preliminary hearing on 9th March.

Speculation around the relationship status of Vijay Deverakonda and Rashmika Mandanna has once again taken centre stage on social media.A video showing Vijay’s Jubilee Hills residence in Hyderabad lit up with decorative lights has gone viral, prompting fresh chatter about an impending wedding on February 24. The development comes at a time when rumours suggest the two may be planning an intimate ceremony in Udaipur. However, the actors have not issued any official statement regarding the claims.

Unverified wedding card circulates online

Fueling the speculation further, an alleged wedding invitation of the rumoured couple has been widely shared across platforms. The invite claims that the ceremony is scheduled for February 26, with a reception to follow in Hyderabad on March 4.The invitation reads, “I’m writing to share some special news and to invite you to be part of a huge moment. With the love and blessings of our families, Rashmika and I will be getting married on 26.02.26 in a small and intimate ceremony.”It further states, “As we begin this new chapter—celebrating and creating memories around our union—it would truly mean a lot to us to celebrate with those who have been a part of our journeys. Your presence and blessings would make this occasion even more special for us. We warmly invite you to join us and bless us at our Wedding Reception.”The note concludes with, “We look forward to celebrating together. Warm regards, Vijay (on behalf of Rashmika & myself).”Despite the detailed wording, the authenticity of the invite remains unverified.

Long-standing dating speculation

Vijay and Rashmika, who shared screen space in Geetha Govindam and Dear Comrade, have been linked for years. Their off-screen camaraderie, frequent holidays and social media interactions have often added fuel to relationship rumours.While they have consistently maintained that they are “just friends,” Rashmika has previously described Vijay as a “blessing” in her life, acknowledging his support during emotionally challenging times. As the videos and invite continue to circulate, fans remain eager for clarity, but for now, the actors are yet to confirm any wedding plans.

Facebook cofounder Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly making big bets on both coasts of the US but his latest moves suggest the Meta CEO may be preparing to say goodbye to California for good. According to a recent report, Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, pledged $50 million to Sacramento State University to build state-of-the-art STEM labs and an AI center. “These investments will help strengthen our communities and support the next generation of leaders and innovators,” said Zuckerberg, who owns a compound of 11 properties in Palo Alto’s Crescent Park neighborhood, valued at more than $110 million.According to Wall Street Journal, weeks later after the donation, Zuckerberg purchased a waterfront mansion on Indian Creek — a man-made island in Miami’s Biscayne Bay often called “Billionaires Bunker.” The property is said to be a newly-completed estate and is expected to fetch between $150 million and $200 million.

Tech billionaires leaving California

Zuckerberg isn’t alone who is leaving the US state. A wave of California tech titans has been quietly relocating to South Florida in recent months. Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have both made major purchases in the Miami area, reports said.Page picked up multiple properties in Coconut Grove for roughly $188 million, while Brin is reportedly in talks for a $50 million home on Biscayne Bay. Further, Venture capitalist Peter Thiel made his Florida move official by opening a Miami office for his investment firm on New Year’s Eve.All the tech leaders are moving to Florida due to California’s proposed Billionaire Tax Act – a ballot measure under which the state would impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of anyone worth over $1 billion. If it qualifies for the November ballot and passes, it would retroactively apply to anyone who was a California resident as of January 1, 2026.For Zuckerberg, whose net worth hovers around $240 billion according to Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index, that’s a potential tax bill north of $10 billion. Notably, Zuckerberg hasn’t made any public statements about the billionaires’ tax.

India, the world’s third-biggest oil importer and consumer has reshaped its crude sourcing strategy, according to data from industry sources. Russian crude shipments in January made up the smallest portion of New Delhi’s oil imports since late 2022. During the same period, supplies from the Middle East rose to their highest share, Reuters reported quoting sources.Back in 2022, Russia emerged as India’s top crude supplier after Indian refiners began buying large volumes of discounted Russian oil following Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine. Over time, Russia’s share of India’s crude oil imports climbed from under 1% to almost 40% at its highest point. However, recent US sanctions on Russian suppliers and Washington’s push for a trade agreement have led New Delhi to cut back on Russian oil purchases, the data showed.Since November, China has overtaken India as Russia’s largest buyer of seaborne crude.Smallest share since late 2022In January, India imported about 1.1 million barrels per day of Russian crude, the lowest level since November 2022, with Russia’s share in India’s total oil imports shrinking to 21.2%.January imports from Russia were down 23.5% from December and roughly one-third lower than a year earlier.According to Reuters, analysts expect imports to drop further, averaging around 1–1.2 million bpd in February and about 800,000 bpd in March, though mid-term flows are seen declining gradually rather than ending completely.“February numbers may appear slightly lower due to timing, as some end-month cargoes discharge in the following month,” Sumit Ritola, lead research analyst, refining and modelling at Kpler told Reuters.Who’s filling the gap?To offset reduced Russian volumes, Indian refiners have turned to other grades from the Middle East, South America and Western suppliers.Middle Eastern crude made up roughly 55% of India’s total imports in January, while Latin American grades hit a 12-month high of about 10%, the data showed.Saudi Arabia has regained its position as India’s top supplier, with imports tracking at record levels so far in February. “February month-to-date data already shows Saudi Arabia regaining its position as India’s top supplier, with imports tracking at a new all-time high,” Ritola told the agency.Lower Russian purchases have lifted OPEC’s share in India’s crude basket to an 11-month high.This comes as US has cut some tariffs on Indian goods and dropped a 25% punitive duty after New Delhi agreed to scale back Russian oil imports, and is also encouraging India to boost energy purchases from the US and potentially Venezuela.

Anthropic’s AI, Claude Code, now generates nearly all internal code, prompting questions about its 100+ open engineering roles. Executives clarify human engineers are crucial for prompting, customer interaction, and strategic decisions. This shift elevates engineers to focus on system design and product direction, with AI handling repetitive coding tasks. The trend signifies a significant evolution in software development.

Anthropic’s own executives have confirmed it—Claude Code is now writing nearly 100% of the company’s internal code. So when the company’s job page still shows 100+ open engineering positions, the obvious question is: what exactly are these engineers supposed to do Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code, addressed this directly when an X user flagged the apparent contradiction. His answer was simple. “Someone has to prompt the Claudes, talk to customers, coordinate with other teams, decide what to build next,” he wrote. “Engineering is changing and great engineers are more important than ever.”

Claude is writing Claude—but humans are still running the show

The backdrop here matters. At the 2026 Cisco AI Summit, Anthropic CPO Mike Krieger confirmed that the company’s AI tools now generate nearly all of its internal code. “Claude products and Claude code are being entirely written by Claude,” he said—building on CEO Dario Amodei’s earlier prediction that AI would handle 90% of coding, a figure that has since been surpassed inside Anthropic itself.Boris Cherny added more colour in a Fortune interview, saying he personally hasn’t written a single line of code in over two months, shipping 22 to 27 pull requests a day—all 100% Claude-generated.

AI is handling the grunt work—engineers are making the bigger calls

What this means in practice is that engineers have moved up the stack. Repetitive tasks—drafting features, refactoring, writing documentation—now belong to Claude. Humans focus on system design, architectural decisions, customer conversations, and deciding what gets built next. Everything AI produces is still reviewed and validated before it ships.The trend isn’t unique to Anthropic. Microsoft and Salesforce report around 30% AI-generated code, while a recent Science journal study put the figure at roughly 29% for GitHub Python functions in the US. Inside the frontier labs, though, the curve is far steeper—and Cherny thinks the rest of the industry will get there soon.

Market ended in green for the third straight session on Wednesday, with benchmark equity indices rising on the back of last-hour buying in banking, metal and FMCG stocks.The 30-share BSE Sensex jumped 283.29 points, or 0.34 per cent, to settle at 83,734.25 in a volatile trade. The 50-share NSE Nifty gained 93.95 points, or 0.37 per cent, to close at 25,819.35.Among the Sensex constituents, Tata Steel, ITC and Kwality Walls were the major gainers. On the other hand, Eternal, Tech Mahindra and Infosys were the laggards.“Indian markets witnessed a late surge driven by broad-based buying after a cautious start, as positive domestic sectoral cues helped offset lingering global uncertainties,” Vinod Nair, Head of Research, Geojit Investments Ltd, said.He added that banking and financial stocks remained resilient on the back of steady asset-quality expectations, while selective buying in FMCG names contributed to relative outperformance.Broader indices also traded firm, with the BSE Smallcap Select Index rising 1.02 per cent and the Midcap Select Index gaining 0.40 per cent.“Indian equity markets extended gains for the third consecutive session staging a gradual recovery, with the Nifty rising 0.4 per cent, supported by strength in PSU and metal stocks. On the flows front, FIIs remained net buyers on Tuesday, purchasing equities worth Rs 995 crore, while DIIs also bought shares worth Rs 187 crore, providing support to sentiment,” Siddhartha Khemka, Head of Research, Wealth Management, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd, said.

Nifty50 top gainers

Nifty50 top losers

Sensex top gainers

Sensex top losers

In Asian markets, Japan’s Nikkei 225 benchmark closed 1 per cent higher, while markets in China, Hong Kong and South Korea remained closed due to Lunar New Year holidays. European markets were trading higher in mid-session deals, and US equities had settled in positive territory on Tuesday.Foreign institutional investors bought equities worth Rs 995.21 crore on Tuesday, while domestic institutional investors purchased stocks worth Rs 187.04 crore, according to exchange data. Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, rose 0.33 per cent to USD 67.64 per barrel.(Disclaimer: Recommendations and views on the stock market, other asset classes or personal finance management tips given by experts are their own. These opinions do not represent the views of The Times of India)

NEW DELHI: Galgotias University on Wednesday apologised after a controversy erupted over the display of a Chinese-made robotic dog at its stall during the AI Impact Summit expo at Bharat Mandapam. In the statement however, the university blamed the woman professor for the fiasco. The university issued a press statement after it was asked to vacate its pavilion at the summit. In the statement, it expressed regret over the confusion and said it arose because Professor Neha Singh, who was managing the stall, was unaware of the product’s technical origins.

“We at Galgotias University, wish to apologise profusely for the confusion created at the recent AI Summit. One of our representatives, manning the pavilion, was ill-informed. She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information even though she was not authorised to speak to the press… Understanding the organisers sentiment we have vacated the premises.”The robotic dog, showcased as “Orion”, was identified by observers as the Unitree Go2, a commercially available quadruped robot manufactured by Chinese robotics firm Unitree Robotics. The incident triggered criticism, as the summit was aimed at highlighting domestic innovation in artificial intelligence.The controversy began after the robotic dog displayed at the university’s booth was recognised as the Unitree Go2, which is available commercially in India for around Rs 2–3 lakh. Critics alleged that the robot was presented as an in-house innovation, raising concerns about the showcasing of imported technology at a national AI event.Government sources earlier said Galgotias University was asked to vacate its stall following the row. Power supply to the pavilion was also reportedly cut off after the university was directed to leave the expo.The AI Impact Summit 2026, inaugurated by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is a flagship event focused on promoting India’s advancements and capabilities in artificial intelligence.

What triggered the row?

The controversy escalated after Professor Neha Singh, while presenting the robot earlier, told DD News, “We are the first private university investing more than 350 crore rupees in artificial intelligence and we have a dedicated data science and artificial intelligence block on the campus. So Orion has been developed by the Center of Excellences and as you can see, it can take all shapes and sizes.”“It’s quite naughty also. It’s quite naughty also and it can perform small tasks of surveillance, monitoring,” she added.Her remarks led to scrutiny after observers identified the robot as the Unitree Go2, a product sold globally by Unitree Robotics.

University’s earlier clarifications

In its first clarification issued after the row broke out, the university stated that it had neither built nor claimed to have built the robotic dog, emphasising that its focus was on student learning.“Let us be clear – Galgotias has not built this robodog, neither have we claimed. But what we are building are minds that will soon design, engineer, and manufacture such technologies right here in Bharat. Innovation knows no borders. Learning should not either. We will continue to source the best technologies from across the world so our students can study them, challenge them, improve upon them—and ultimately create world-class solutions from India for the world.”In a subsequent statement, the university said concerns about “propaganda” against it were misplaced.“We at Galgotias, faculty and students, are deeply pained by the propaganda campaign against our university. We would like to clearly state that the robotic programming is part of our endeavour to make students learn AI programming and develop & deploy real world skills using globally available tools and resources, given developing AI talent is need of an hour.”Professor Neha Singh also addressed the controversy, saying, “The controversy happened because things may not have been expressed clearly. I take accountability that perhaps I did not communicate it properly, as it was done with a lot of energy and enthusiasm and very quickly, so I may not have come across as eloquently as I usually do. Also, the intent may not have been properly understood. One important point is regarding the robot dog—we cannot claim that we manufactured it. I have told everyone that we introduced it to our students to inspire them to create something better on their own. Our university contributes to building future leaders by providing cutting-edge technologies in the field of AI, and it will continue to do so.”

Rahul Gandhi describes summit as ‘disorganised PR spectacle’

The issue also drew sharp reactions from the Opposition.The Congress party said on X: “The Modi government has made a laughing stock of India globally, with regard to AI. In the ongoing AI summit, Chinese robots are being displayed as our own. The Chinese media has mocked us. This is truly embarrassing for India. What is even more shameful is the fact that Modi’s minister Ashwini Vaishnaw is indulging in the same falsehood, promoting China’s robots at the Indian summit.”“The Modi Government has caused irreparable damage to the image of the country – they have reduced AI to a joke – a field in which we could be world leaders given our data power,” it added.Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi described the summit as a “disorganised PR spectacle.” In a post on X, he said, “Instead of leveraging India’s talent and data, the AI summit is a disorganised PR spectacle – Indian data up for sale, Chinese products showcased.”

NEW DELHI: The controversy around Galgotias University’s displays at its booth at the ongoing India AI Impact Summit 2026 as an in-house innovation, has escalated further, with fresh scrutiny now focusing on another device showcased by the institution. Barely 24 hours after being asked to vacate its stall at the flagship AI summit in the national capital, it is now facing questions over a “drone soccer arena” that faculty members claimed was developed entirely in-house.

In a video now going viral on social media, the university’s communications professor is seen speaking about a “drone soccer arena”, calling it another in-house innovation and claiming it to be “India’s first” such system.“It is a very interesting thing, from its end to end engineering to its application, everything has been done at the university and this is India’s first drone soccer arena which you will get to see on campus at Galgotias and here the children play games inside this arena, fly it, enhance their flagging skills and are developing it in a new way, with more strength and enhanced features, what are these things,” she says.However, several posts on social media have rebutted the assertions, alleging that the drone closely resembles a commercially available product from South Korea. Users have pointed to Helsel, which says it pioneered drone soccer in 2015 before launching the sport in South Korea in 2017. The sport is recognised by the World Air Sports Federation. Some users have also claimed that the device resembles products such as the Stryker V3 ARF available in the market.The Youth Congress also weighed in on X, alleging that the drone was a Korean-made product and questioning the university’s claims.Taking a jibe at PM Modi it said, “First China, now Korea. Galgotias is on a world tour of ‘borrowed’ innovation. They claimed to have built India’s first Drone Soccer from scratch on campus, but it’s actually just a Striker V3 ARF from Korea. Atmanirbhar’ or just ‘Atmanir-buy’ Modi ji?”Earlier a robotic dog showcased by the university as “Orion,” was recognised by observers as the Unitree Go2 made by Chinese robotics firm Unitree. The incident quickly escalated into a wider controversy at the Summit, a flagship AI event inaugurated by PM Modi.The university has not issued a fresh clarification regarding the drone allegations. Earlier, in a press release regarding the robodog controversy the institute had termed it a ‘propaganda’.

What the row is about

The robotic dog showcased at the university’s stall was identified as the Unitree Go2, a commercially available quadruped robot that is sold in India at an estimated price of Rs 2–3 lakh.Critics alleged that the robot was projected at the summit as an in-house innovation by the university, prompting questions over the display of imported technology at a national AI platform intended to spotlight indigenous developments.As scrutiny mounted, electricity supply to the university’s pavilion at the AI Summit was reportedly disconnected after organisers asked the institution to vacate the exhibition space. Government sources later confirmed that authorities had directed the university to vacate the expo area, stressing compliance and transparency standards at the summit.

What triggered the row

During an earlier presentation of the robot, Professor Neha Singh told DD News that the university had made significant investments in artificial intelligence.She said, “We are the first private university investing more than 350 crore rupees in artificial intelligence and we have a dedicated data science and artificial intelligence block on the campus. So Orion has been developed by the Center of Excellences and as you can see, it can take all shapes and sizes.”Describing its functions, she added, “It’s quite naughty also. It’s quite naughty also and it can perform small tasks of surveillance, monitoring.”Following the robotic dog controversy, the university had said in a statement, “Let us be clear, Galgotias has not built this robodog, nor have we claimed to do so. What we are building are minds that will soon design, engineer and manufacture such technologies in Bharat.”

Buying a home remains one of the most significant financial and emotional milestones for many Indians. However, real estate experts caution that overlooking due diligence—particularly on location, legal clearances and financial planning—can turn a dream purchase into a long-term liability.Industry advisers say careful research and patience are essential to ensure that a property remains both livable and financially rewarding over time.

Location first, property next

Real estate advisers emphasise that a property’s locality often determines its long-term value more than the home itself.Emerging localities, while often more affordable than established neighbourhoods, can offer strong appreciation potential if connectivity and civic infrastructure are improving. However, experts warn that ignoring poor roads, weak transport links, or inadequate civic amenities may limit future resale value and rental demand.Prospective buyers are advised to visit shortlisted locations at different times of the day to better understand traffic conditions, safety, noise levels and overall livability. Areas with expanding infrastructure, good connectivity and a healthy social environment typically see stronger long-term demand.

Legal checks that cannot be ignored

On the legal front, specialists stress that verifying ownership and documentation is non-negotiable. Buyers must ensure that the seller has a clear title and full rights to transfer the property.In the case of land purchases, it is critical to confirm that the plot is approved for residential use, as agricultural land requires formal conversion before housing construction.Projects, particularly in smaller towns and tier-III cities, must also have necessary approvals and no-objection certificates from local authorities.For apartment buyers, reviewing sanctioned building plans, title deeds, land-use permissions and occupation or completion certificates is essential. With most urban projects now governed by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), buyers are advised to independently verify the project’s registration on the relevant state portal rather than relying solely on developer claims.

Ready-to-move vs under-construction homes

The choice between ready-to-move and under-construction properties often depends on a buyer’s financial position and risk appetite. Ready homes provide immediate possession and eliminate uncertainties related to construction delays or changes in specifications, though they typically command higher prices.Under-construction properties are generally 10–20% cheaper and offer flexible payment schedules linked to construction progress. They may also feature newer designs and amenities. However, such properties attract 5% GST and carry risks related to project timelines and delivery, making the developer’s track record a critical factor.Experts advise buyers to visit completed projects by the same builder, interact with existing residents and verify compliance with RERA norms and industry bodies such as CREDAI. Plot buyers, meanwhile, should confirm that the land is free from encumbrances and aligned with intended usage.

Budgeting beyond the base price

Financial planning is another area where buyers often underestimate costs. Apart from the down payment—typically around 20% of the property value—buyers must account for stamp duty, registration charges, maintenance deposits, loan processing fees, interior work and recurring expenses such as EMIs and property taxes.Stamp duty and registration alone can add 5–8% to the property cost, while GST applies to most under-construction homes. Overall acquisition costs may rise by 10–20% above the quoted price, making it essential to maintain a financial buffer for unforeseen expenses.Loan eligibility is closely linked to credit health, with experts noting that a credit score around 750 improves approval chances and helps secure better interest rates. Financial advisers also recommend keeping EMI commitments within 40% of monthly income and avoiding unrecorded cash transactions to prevent legal complications.

Due diligence over mpulse Buying

Across industry advisories, one consistent message stands out: avoid rushing into property decisions. Experts warn against aggressive sales tactics and limited-time offers that discourage thorough scrutiny of documents and property conditions.From consulting legal professionals and verifying RERA details to speaking with future neighbours and inspecting the property independently, buyers are encouraged to prioritise preparation over speed. As advisers note, purchasing a home is not a race but a long-term investment decision—one where careful research today can prevent years of financial and legal stress later.