Visuals from protest (Video/X)

NEW DELHI: A clash broke out on Saturday between Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party workers during a protest by the BJP against a “shirtless” demonstration by Indian Youth Congress (IYC) members at the India AI Impact Summit. According to the video circulating on social media, the confrontation saw stone-pelting, prompting police intervention to control the situation and ensure public safety.Deputy Commissioner of Police Krishna Lalchandani said that the clash occurred near the Congress office, where the BJP protest was underway. “There were two parties involved. One party was protesting. The protest was near the Congress office. The area had been barricaded, and proper police arrangements had been ensured. Suddenly, some rumour-mongering occurred, and some stones were thrown. Then, the other side also threw stones. Some people were injured… It’s too early to say who threw the first stone,” Lalchandani added.The incident follows a “shirtless” protest staged by Youth Congress workers on Friday inside the Bharat Mandapam, accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of compromising the country’s interests during the AI summit. During the demonstration, protesters removed their shirts and raised slogans, drawing attention to what they described as a political and national concern.Patiala House Court on Saturday rejected bail applications for four arrested Youth Congress workers, Krishna Hari, Kundan Yadav, Ajay Kumar, and Narasimha Yadav and sent them to police custody for five days. Police said that the custody was needed to investigate a potential larger conspiracy, including the funding and planning of the protest. Three policemen were reportedly injured during the confrontation.Delhi Police officials said that the protesters had registered online to obtain QR codes to enter the venue and initially planned to use black umbrellas with printed stickers to convey their message.“However, they later felt that the black umbrellas might draw the attention of the security personnel manning the gates, so they changed their plan and got the printed stickers placed on T-shirts instead,” a police source said.The accused reportedly engaged in a scuffle with security personnel and police staff during the protest. Investigators are also examining if the demonstration was part of a wider conspiracy linked to similar protests in Nepal.The lawyer for the accused argued that the protest was a form of political dissent and that the workers were being targeted because of their party affiliation. “Political dissent shouldn’t be crushed like this. The accused are educated office bearers exercising their right to protest peacefully,” the lawyer said.

‘BJP’s reign of terror is ongoing in MP’: Congress reacts to the protest

The Congress party reacting to the incident, blamed the state BJP leadership for the violence. In a post on X, the party wrote, “The BJP’s reign of terror is ongoing in Madhya Pradesh. BJP goons have stormed into the state Congress office. There, these goons engaged in scuffles with Congress workers and caused widespread vandalism. All this thuggery was carried out under the patronage of the BJP government. Here, the government itself is tearing the law to shreds. Immediate action must be taken against these BJP goons.”

Indian-American lawyer Neal Katyal

The Indian-American litigator Neal Katyal, who argued before the US Supreme Court against Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, praised his team as the “best legal team in the world” after the landmark ruling struck down the measures.His reaction came after the US Supreme Court handed Trump a stinging defeat by declaring his tariffs “illegal” and questioning the president’s authority to impose such sweeping trade duties without Congress.

In a post on X, the former acting US solicitor general, who served under the Barack Obama administration, Neal Katyal wrote, “I have the best legal team in the world. Brilliant lawyers & the kindest of souls. Lucky.”Earlier, Katyal welcomed the ruling as a major blow to Trump and described it as a “decisive victory” for constitutional governance and the separation of powers.Katyal serves as the Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University Law Center, said the ruling was a sweeping endorsement of the arguments made in the case, which challenged what the plaintiffs described as unconstitutional taxation by the executive branch.In his earlier statement on X, he wrote, “Today, the US Supreme Court stood up for the rule of law and Americans everywhere. Its message was simple: Presidents are powerful, but our Constitution is more powerful still. In America, only Congress can impose taxes on the American people. The US Supreme Court gave us everything we asked for in our legal case. Everything.”“I’m grateful for the leadership of the Liberty Justice Center, and in particular for the brilliant advocacy by its chair, Sara Albrecht, who led the fight when others wouldn’t and was dauntless in its defense of our constitutional order. I’m also grateful to the five small business owners who stood up against these unjust, unconstitutional taxes. By taking a stand, they have delivered crucial relief to tens of thousands of businesses and millions of consumers across the country,” the statement read further.“Finally, I lack the words to properly thank my brilliant Milbank team, especially Colleen Roh Sinzdak and Sami Ilagan, who worked with me day and night for many months to craft the winning argument. This case has always been about the presidency, not any one president. It has always been about separation of powers, and not the politics of the moment. I’m gratified to see our Supreme Court, which has been the bedrock of our government for 250 years, protect our most fundamental values,” the statement concluded.Katyal, a partner at global law firm Milbank LLP, has argued dozens of cases before the US Supreme Court and is widely regarded as one of the country’s leading constitutional lawyers. His work, both in academia and litigation, has focused on executive power, national security law, and constitutional checks and balances.The case, supported by the Liberty Justice Center and a group of small business owners, focused on whether the president could impose taxes without approval from Congress. By siding with the challengers, the Court reaffirmed that the power to levy taxes rests solely with Congress under Article I of the Constitution.In a 6–3 ruling on Friday, the apex court reviewed tariffs imposed under an emergency powers law, including the sweeping “reciprocal” duties Trump levied on nearly all countries. The justices held that his use of emergency authority to impose import tariffs without approval from Congress was unlawful.

Canada’s Sidney Crosby (87) is attended to after being injured during the second period of a men’s ice hockey quarterfinal game between Canada and Czechia at the 2026 Winter Olympics, in Milan, Italy, Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

Team Canada can get a big push before the Olympic gold medal game with the head coach Jon Cooper giving a positive report on team captain Sidney Crosby. The former striker is already out with a lower-body injury, not playing in the semifinal, but showing prospects of a possible recovery to play in the final.The lack of Crosby could be experienced in the hard-earned semifinal victory of Canada, but the team still had to scratch out a win. Now, the question that everyone is asking is whether the longtime leader will take part and offer a timely boost to the sports on the biggest international platform, the hockey.

Jon Cooper updates Sidney Crosby’s Team Canada gold medal status

After the semifinal, Cooper said that Crosby had a better chance of playing in the final than in the semifinal. The coaches will look at how quickly he gets back to normal as a sign of his recovery and whether he can handle the intensity of the game.The men’s ice hockey team from Canada beat Finland in a physical game, but they didn’t play in their usual rhythmic way. It was clear that Crosby didn’t have the leadership skills or the ability to control the puck when it mattered.Crosby, who is the captain of the Pittsburgh Penguins, is also an important part of what it means to be Canadian. He is very valuable because of his international experience and ability to handle stress, even when he is only deployed for a few hours.Canada is now ready to play the US men for the gold medal. The Olympic final will be interesting no matter what, even if Crosby isn’t there.Jon Cooper’s most recent comments have given Canadians hope as they wait for a final word on whether Sidney Crosby will be able to play in the Olympic gold medal game. The veteran forward is still healing from an injury to his lower body, but there are signs that he is making real progress. Canada’s semifinal performance showed that they can win without him, but Crosby’s experience and leadership could make a big difference against Team USA. Before the puck drops, the coaching staff will carefully weigh the pros and cons of long-term health against the chance to win Olympic gold.

Maye Musk defends Elon Musk

Elon Musk, the CEO of companies including Tesla, SpaceX and X, has frequently been the subject of public debate and media reports. Critics have questioned his business choices, his role in social media policy, and his political ties in the last few years. Mainstream media, social media discussions, and commentaries often talk about these issues. People around the world support and criticise them.In February 2026, Maye Musk, Elon Musk’s mother, publicly defended her son against what she called unfair coverage and “extreme negativity” from some news outlets. Maye Musk, who has a sizable following on the social media platform X, posted a message on February 19 highlighting her reaction to ongoing criticism of Elon Musk’s actions and achievements, especially in technology and business. Her comments drew attention because of her long-standing public profile as a dietitian, author and former international model. Throughout her life, she has also authored books on health and her own memoir.The post came out during bigger talks about how Elon Musk affects business, technology, and public conversation. People all over the world, including in the United States, are still talking about and paying attention to Musk’s leadership of well-known companies and his presence on social media.

Maye Musk’s message defends Elon Musk on social media

On X (formerly Twitter), Maye Musk wrote that she has been aware of negative and what she described as “dishonesty and extreme negativity” in mainstream media coverage for many years. She said that it was difficult to cope with what she termed “hateful headlines” while citing her son’s accomplishments around the world. Maye Musk also mentioned in her post that she recently finished writing another book that, according to her, includes content about her past interactions with news outlets and journalists. She expressed approval of Elon Musk’s decision to purchase Twitter and rename it X, a move she said made her “happy” every day.Maye Musk’s statement did not include specific examples of news coverage she was referring to, but reflects her view on how some critics have described her son’s work.

Media and public reactions on Maye Musk’s X post

Maye Musk’s post continues a pattern seen with public figures’ family members engaging in discussions about media coverage. Her message showed support for her son and criticism of some media stories, but it also showed how famous people and their families react to public discussion in the digital age.People on different social media sites had different things to say about her post. Many people shared their own thoughts on the media coverage, Elon Musk’s leadership, and Maye Musk’s comments. Like with a lot of posts from famous people, some people agreed with them and others disagreed.

About Maye Musk

Maye Musk, 77, is a Canadian-born model and registered dietitian. She has had a long career in modelling and health, and she has published books in both areas. Her memoir, A Woman Makes a Plan: Advice for a Lifetime of Adventure, Beauty, and Success, was published in 2019. She has also been active on social media, where she shares her own views on a range of topics and engages with a large audience.Her public defence of her son adds to a history of her speaking in support of him. In previous years, she has praised Elon Musk’s work and influence in technology, and the two have appeared together at public events.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva during a joint press meet

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on Saturday set a target to raise bilateral trade to $20 billion within five years and signed key agreements in areas including rare earth minerals, digital partnership and mining cooperation. The two countries sought to deepen their strategic and economic ties.Addressing a joint press conference in New Delhi after delegation-level talks, PM Modi gave details on the discussions, revealing that the two nations’ leaders focused on expanding cooperation across sectors and strengthening the India–Brazil strategic partnership.“I am delighted to welcome President Lula and his delegation to India. India-Brazil relations have long benefited from President Lula’s vision and inspiring leadership,” PM Modi said. “We are committed to taking bilateral trade beyond $20 billion in the next five years. Our trade is not just a figure; it’s a reflection of trust.”He added that the expansion of the India–MERCOSUR trade agreement would further boost economic cooperation, noting that Brazil remains India’s largest trading partner in Latin America.Key agreements signed across strategic sectorsThree agreements were exchanged between the two sides, covering digital cooperation, critical minerals and mining supply chains:

PM Modi described the critical minerals agreement as significant amid global supply chain concerns. “The agreement is a major step towards building resilient supply chains,” he said.The two sides also agreed to expand cooperation in emerging technology sectors. “I am pleased that we are working on establishing a Centre of Excellence for Digital Public Infrastructure in Brazil. We are also prioritising our cooperation in areas such as artificial intelligence, supercomputers, semiconductors, and blockchain,” PM Modi said.

Technology, energy and green cooperation expand

Energy cooperation emerged as a key pillar of the talks, with both sides agreeing to accelerate collaboration in renewable energy and sustainable fuels.“Energy cooperation has been a strong pillar of our relationship. In addition to hydrocarbons, we are also accelerating cooperation in several areas, including renewable energy, ethanol blending, and sustainable aviation fuel,” PM said.He also welcomed Brazil’s participation in global climate initiatives. “Brazil’s active participation in the Global Biofuel Alliance reflects our shared commitment to a green future,” the prime minister added.

Lula calls India ‘digital superpower’, backs stronger strategic ties

President Lula described the meeting as a partnership between two major global powers of the Global South and highlighted the strategic importance of India–Brazil relations.“My dear friend Modi, it is a reason of happiness for me to return to this country for the sixth time. The meeting between India and Brazil is a meeting of superlatives. We are not just the two biggest democracies of the Global South. This is a meeting of a digital superpower with a renewable energy superpower,” Lula said.He said both countries share common positions on global governance and multilateral cooperation.“A turbulent global scenario requires our countries to strengthen and deepen our strategic dialogue. India and Brazil are crucial voices at the UN, the WTO and G20,” he said.Lula came to India on a state visit accompanied by a large delegation, including top Brazilian business leaders, who are expected to participate in a business forum aimed at expanding commercial partnerships.Earlier in the day, he was accorded a ceremonial welcome at Rashtrapati Bhavan and held delegation-level talks with PM Modi at Hyderabad House. He also paid tribute to Mahatma Gandhi at Rajghat.The visit follows PM Modi’s trip to Brasilia in July 2025, the first visit by an Indian prime minister to Brazil in over five decades, and reflects growing momentum in bilateral ties as both countries seek to strengthen trade, technology and strategic cooperation.

Against a seasoned New Zealand outfit, Pakistan will require a stronger collective effort from their batting unit. (Image credit: Agencies)

The contest could hinge on how effectively New Zealand’s middle order handles the craft and variation of Pakistan’s spin attack when the two teams meet in the opening Super Eight Group 2 clash of the T20 World Cup on Saturday.So far in the tournament, the Kiwi batting unit has not quite found top gear. Openers Tim Seifert and Finn Allen have led the charge with three half-centuries between them, but the middle order has struggled to provide consistent support. Glenn Phillips, Rachin Ravindra, Mark Chapman and Daryl Mitchell have all shown flashes without stringing together impactful contributions.

Phillips and Ravindra have registered a fifty each, yet their overall returns remain modest. Ravindra, for instance, has scored 72 runs in four outings, with 59 of those coming in a single innings against Canada. Adding to their challenge is the fact that this will be New Zealand’s first match in Colombo in this edition of the tournament.Pakistan, in contrast, have been based in the Sri Lankan port city since the start of the World Cup and have already featured in two matches at the Premadasa. Their bowlers — especially the spinners — understand the tempo and lengths required on a slow surface where patience often trumps aggression.For New Zealand, it will be crucial that the middle order complements the Powerplay thrust provided by Allen and Seifert. A measured approach will be needed to either post or chase a total in the region of 180 on a pitch that demands calculated strokeplay.Pakistan’s spin arsenal — Usman Tariq, Abrar Ahmed, Saim Ayub, Mohammad Nawaz and Shadab Khan — gives them a clear advantage. However, they have their own concerns with the bat. Shadab, with 88 runs, is their second-highest scorer behind Sahibzada Farhan (220), the tournament’s leading run-getter.Against a seasoned New Zealand outfit, Pakistan will require a stronger collective effort from their batting unit. The biggest concern for the team management remains Babar Azam, who has managed just 66 runs in four matches at a strike rate of 115.78. The former captain has struggled to adapt to the tempo demanded by modern T20 cricket.Another failure could prompt Pakistan to consider Fakhar Zaman, who has yet to feature in the tournament. They are also weighing up the option of recalling left-arm pacer Shaheen Shah Afridi, omitted for the must-win fixture against Namibia.Afridi has claimed three wickets in three matches but at a costly economy rate of 11.22, underlining his difficulty in adjusting to slower conditions. His struggles serve as a warning for New Zealand’s pace-heavy attack.Lockie Ferguson, Matt Henry, Jacob Duffy and James Neesham have all been somewhat expensive and may need to rethink their approach. Greater reliance on variations — knuckle balls, slower bouncers and leg cutters — could be key to unsettling Pakistan’s batters and easing the burden on the spin trio of Mitchell Santner, Ish Sodhi, along with part-time options Ravindra and Phillips.

Pakistan vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 match: Head-to-head record in T20Is

Total matches: 49Pakistan won: 24New Zealand won: 23No Result: 2Performance of both teams in their last 5 matchesPakistan: W, W, W, L, WNew Zealand : L:, W, W, L, W

Pakistan vs New Zealand Super 8s T20 World Cup: R Premdasa stadium T20I record

Total matches: 51No result: 1Most wins by teamIndia – 12 winsSri Lanka – 10 winsAustralia – 7 winsPakistan – 6 winsSouth Africa – 5 winsBangladesh – 5 winsZimbabwe – 3 winsWest Indies – 3 winsNew Zealand – 3 winsEngland – 2 wins

Pakistan vs New Zealand Super 8s: Weather report

Beyond the on-field rivalry, the weather in Colombo threatens to have a major say in the outcome. Rain has been forecast both ahead of and during the contest, which is slated for a 7 PM local start. Showers are likely in the opening half of the evening, with temperatures ranging between 24 and 26 degrees Celsius and humidity levels climbing past 80 per cent.There is no reserve day allocated for this Super 8 encounter. Should persistent rain force an abandonment, the teams will split points — a result that could significantly hurt their chances of progressing to the semi-finals.Match officials will have an extra 90 minutes at their disposal in an effort to produce a result. However, if conditions do not allow even a five-over-a-side game, the fixture will be officially called off.

Pakistan vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 match: Full squads

Squads:Pakistan: Salman Agha (captain), Abrar Ahmed, Babar Azam, Faheem Ashraf, Fakhar Zaman, Khawaja Nafay, Mohammad Nawaz, Salman Mirza, Naseem Shah, Sahibzada Farhan, Saim Ayub, Shaheen Shah Afridi, Shadab Khan, Usman Khan, Usman Tariq.New Zealand: Mitchell Santner (captain), Finn Allen, Mark Chapman, Devon Conway, Jacob Duffy, Lockie Ferguson, Matt Henry, Kyle Jamieson, Daryl Mitchell, James Neesham, Glenn Phillips, Rachin Ravindra, Tim Seifert, Ish Sodhi.

NEW DELHI: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday reiterated his remarks on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, claiming that hie is “compromised.” In a social media post on X, Rahul said the PM Modi‘s “betrayal” stands exposed and he “will surrender again.”“The PM is compromised. His betrayal now stands exposed. He can’t renegotiate. He will surrender again,” Rahul said.Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge also launched a broadside against the Centre and asked why did the “Modi government not wait for the US Supreme Court judgement on tariffs before rushing to fall into a TRAP DEAL.”“Clueless Foreign Policy or One-Sided Surrender? Why did the Modi Govt not wait for the US Supreme Court judgement on tariffs before rushing to fall into a TRAP DEAL, which extracted huge concessions from India?” Kharge asked.“The Joint Statement spoke of zero tariffs on several American exports to India, virtually opening up India’s agriculture to American goods, a plan to import USD 500 billion worth of US goods, a commitment to halt on purchasing Russian oil hurting our energy security and several tax concessions on the digital front,” he added.This comes a day after workers of Youth Congress carried out a shirtless march protesting against US-India trade deal.Meanwhile, US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Trump administration exceeded its legal authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to impose broad-based import tariffs.Terming the SC’s ruling as a “terrible decision”, Trump announced he would sign an executive order for a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. This authority allows for a temporary import surcharge (up to 15%) for 150 days to address balance-of-payments deficits.On Friday, Congress leader and former finance minster P Chidambaram also demanded that the government must explain the impact of the judgment on the “deal” that was announced on February 6 between the US and India.Chidambaram said he had stated that if the Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s imposition of tariffs, the result would be that the US and India would revert to the status quo ante of before April 2, 2025.“Meanwhile, the US has extracted several concessions from India without conceding any. What will happen to those concessions? The joint statement announced Zero tariff on many goods that the US will export to India; that India intends to import USD 500 billion worth of goods from the U.S.; that India will not buy Russian oil; that India will address the non-tariff barriers to U.S. goods, and so on,” the former finance minister said.“What will happen to those promises? An Indian team is now in the U.S. to finalise the text of the Framework Agreement. What will the team do now?” Chidambaram said.

In a shocking development, Bollywood star Ranveer Singh has found himself at the center of an extortion case, allegedly targeted by Harry Boxer of the notorious Bishnoi gang. A threatening voice note from a US number has prompted the Mumbai Police to issue a Look Out Circular for Boxer, intensifying their investigation into a staggering Rs 20 crore ransom demand.

Ranveer Singh recently received extortion threats through a voice note, which was sent on his manager’s phone. Soon, the actor approached the Mumbai Police, and cops are now investigating the matter. It was reported that the threat was sent from a US number and Bishnoi Gang’s Harry Boxer is behind the same. And now, according to the latest development, a lookout notice has been issued against him.

Mumbai Police issues a Look Out Circular

According to the ANI report, the Mumbai Crime Branch has issued a Look Out Circular (LOC) against a person named Harichandra, alias Harry Boxer, who is one of the key members of the Bishnoi gang, in connection to the extortion threat to Ranveer Singh. As per the report, the Mumbai Police had sent the threatening voice note received by Ranveer Singh’s manager to Punjab and Haryana for verification. The sender of the voice note identified himself as Harry Boxer and demanded a ransom of Rs 20 crore.Earlier, a report had mentioned that the demand made was for Rs 10 crore from the Bollywood actor. Reportedly, a senior police official shared that the sender of the voice note identified himself as Harry Boxer. The cops also contacted US authorities to get more details about the number.As per the reports, the voice note was sent shortly after the firing incident that took place outside Rohit Shetty’s home in Mumbai.

Aftereffects of extortion threats

Soon after the actor received extortion threats, Singh’s security was beefed up by the Mumbai police. Reportedly, six guards in civil uniform have been stationed at this Beau Monde society in Worli, Mumbai. The Crime Branch has recorded statements of Ranveer’s manager and is investigating the matter further.Meanwhile, no FIR has been made so far.

More about Ranveer Singh

The actor is gearing up for the release of his next film, ‘Dhurandhar’, directed by Aditya Dhar. The film is scheduled to arrive in theaters on March 19, 2026. Apart from this, the actor is also in the news for his fight with Farhan Akhtar’s production house after his exit from ‘Don 3’.

President Donald Trump and Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch stand with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his wife Cheryl Hines, and other family members, with his commission, before he is sworn in as Health and Human Services Secretary in the Oval Office at the White House, in Washington. (AP/PTI)

In a landmark decision that reshaped the limits of presidential power in the United States, the Supreme Court on February 20, 2026 struck down Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs in a 6–3 ruling. The verdict was historic not merely because it invalidated one of Trump’s most aggressive economic policies, but because two justices he personally appointed joined the majority against him. The case quickly became a defining moment in the ongoing constitutional debate over how far a US president can go in wielding economic authority without Congress.

What the court ruled

At the heart of the case was whether Trump could use emergency powers under a national-security law to impose broad tariffs on imports. The Supreme Court ruled that the statute did not authorise such sweeping action. It held that tariffs are essentially a form of taxation, and under the Constitution, the power to impose taxes rests with Congress.Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts framed the case as a fundamental separation-of-powers question. He warned that allowing a president to impose tariffs without clear legislative approval would effectively give the executive branch unlimited authority to reshape the economy.

The Trump appointees who broke ranks

Two of Trump’s own nominees, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, joined the majority, delivering a striking institutional rebuke.Gorsuch, appointed in 2017, has long championed strict constitutional limits on executive power. In this case, he emphasised that major economic actions require explicit congressional authorisation and cannot rest on vague statutory language. His opinion reflected a consistent judicial philosophy that prioritises constitutional structure over political alignment.Barrett, Trump’s 2020 appointee, also sided with the majority. She agreed that Congress must clearly delegate authority before a president can take decisions with vast economic consequences. Her vote was particularly significant because she is widely regarded as one of the court’s most conservative members.

The conservative divide

The ruling exposed a deep split within the court’s conservative bloc. Chief Justice Roberts, though appointed by a Republican president, joined Gorsuch and Barrett in striking down the tariffs, creating a three-member conservative majority against Trump.On the other side, conservatives Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. They argued that Congress had already delegated broad authority to presidents to regulate foreign commerce and that Trump’s tariffs fell within that tradition. Their dissent reflected a longstanding judicial approach that favours strong executive power, especially in matters of national security and foreign policy.All three liberal justices voted with the majority, making the final alignment a rare cross-ideological coalition driven more by constitutional interpretation than partisan ideology.

Political fallout

The ruling triggered a furious response from Trump, who publicly criticised the justices who sided against him, including his own nominees. Within hours, he signalled plans to pursue new tariffs under alternative legal authorities, underscoring that the political battle over trade powers is far from settled.

Why the ruling matters

Beyond trade policy, the decision is widely seen as one of the most consequential limits placed on presidential authority in decades. It reinforced the constitutional principle that economic taxation powers remain firmly with Congress, even during national emergencies.The judgment also highlighted a broader philosophical divide within the conservative legal movement over how far executive power should extend.

Bottom line

The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling was not simply a legal setback for Donald Trump. It was a defining constitutional moment that reaffirmed congressional authority over taxation and revealed that even a president’s own appointees may ultimately side with institutional limits over political loyalty.