Breaking News
CrPC cover for women can’t be invoked in Fema case: Delhi HC | India News


CrPC cover for women can’t be invoked in Fema case: Delhi HC

NEW DELHI: The protection enjoyed by a woman under Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is not available in proceedings related to Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema), which is governed by civil law, Delhi high court has ruled.Justice Neena Bansal Krishna dismissed a writ petition filed by a 53-year-old Canadian citizen challenging ED summons issued under Fema Section 37 for recording of her statement, rejecting the contention that safeguards guaranteed to women under CrPC applied to such summons.The petitioner argued that she could not be compelled to appear at the ED office and her statement must be recorded at her residence. She cited CrPC Section 160(1), which prevents women from being required to appear at places other than their residence for investigation. However, the HC highlighted that Fema investigations were civil-administrative proceedings, not criminal inquiries, and therefore, the gender-based protection available under CrPC could not be invoked.“The PMLA and the Fema have distinct statutory frameworks and nature of proceedings. Section 50 PMLA confers criminal investigative powers on ED involving summons for inquiries related to money laundering, which is a scheduled offence under PMLA and involves criminal prosecution. In contrast, Section 37 Fema is primarily concerned with civil-administrative investigations of foreign exchange contraventions governed by a regulatory framework distinct from criminal law. Secondly, there is a difference in the scope of summons and procedural safeguards,” the court said.“Civil code contains no provision like Section 160 CrPC mandating the recording of the statement of a woman at her residence. The insistence of the petitioner for not appearing before the authority is, therefore, without any basis,” Justice Krishna observed.“Powers regarding discovery and production of evidence under Section 37 Fema are analogous to those under Section 131 Income Tax Act, which is governed by civil code and therefore, Section 160 CrPC would not be applicable,” HC added.





Source link

Tanzid Hasan’s scorching performance leads Bangladesh to T20I series triumph over Ireland



In the decider of the three-match T20I series at Bir Sreshtho Flight Lieutenant Matiur Rahman Stadium in Chattogram on Tuesday, Bangladesh stamped their authority by defeating Ireland by eight wickets with 38 balls to spare, clinching the series 2-1.

Ireland set a modest target of 118 runs after being restricted to 117 all out, thanks to a disciplined bowling effort from Bangladesh. Tanzid Hasan’s unbeaten 55 off 36 balls was the highlight of the run chase as Bangladesh comfortably crossed the finish line at 119/2 in 13.4 overs, underlining their dominance in the final game.​

Bangladesh’s disciplined bowling strategy against Ireland

Ireland’s innings began with promise as opener Paul Stirling top-scored with 38 runs off 27 deliveries, offering some early fireworks, complemented by Tim Tector’s quick 17. However, Bangladesh bowlers maintained tight lines and lengths to curb free scoring opportunities. Mahedi Hasan and Rishad Hossain bowled impressively, with Mahedi finishing with 1/24 in four overs and Rishad striking thrice for 21 runs. Shoriful Islam also contributed decisively, taking two wickets for 21 runs.

Most notably, Mustafizur Rahman was outstanding, claiming three crucial wickets for just 11 runs in his three overs, dismantling key Irish batters in the middle order. Ireland’s batting lineup faltered under sustained pressure and disciplined bowling, losing wickets at regular intervals and managing only 117 runs in 19.5 overs. Extras were kept minimal, showcasing Bangladesh’s control throughout Ireland’s innings.​

Tanzid Hasan’s blistering knock secures an emphatic T20I series win for Bangladesh

Chasing a below-par total, Bangladesh’s openers started positively but lost a couple of early wickets, with Saif Hassan contributing 19 runs before falling to Craig Young. The captain Litton Das could only manage seven before falling to Harry Tector. However, Tanzid anchored the chase brilliantly, displaying a blend of aggressive stroke play and calculated risk-taking. Tanzid’s 55* came off just 36 balls against tight bowling, laced with four boundaries and three sixes, ensuring a steady flow of runs. Partnering well with Parvez Hossain Emon (33* off 26 balls), the duo took charge and paced the chase expertly. They put on a resolute unbeaten partnership that guided Bangladesh home with more than six overs remaining, highlighting the dominance Bangladesh had in this match. Tanzid’s all-round impact extended into fielding as well, with multiple catches taken off Ireland’s bat, underlining his complete match-winning performance.​

Also READ: BAN vs IRE: Towel interference turns Litton Das’s catch into six as Bangladesh edge Ireland in last-over thriller

Overall, Bangladesh displayed superior strategy with ball and bat in the decisive T20I of the series. Their bowling attack stifled Ireland’s middle order, while Tanzid’s masterclass with the bat brought clinical finishing to the chase, earning Bangladesh a well-deserved and emphatic series victory on home soil. This victory gives Bangladesh momentum and confidence as they look ahead to future limited-overs fixtures.

Also READ: Matthew Humphreys’ four-wicket haul powers Ireland to a dominant win over Bangladesh in the T20I opener





Source link

‘High score & upgrade to general category won’t erode quota perks’ | India News


‘High score & upgrade to general category won’t erode quota perks’

KOLKATA: Even if a candidate under the reserved category scored higher than the cut-off marks and was upgraded to general category, s/he would continue to enjoy benefits of the former category, Calcutta high court held Tuesday.The directive came after an SSC candidate, who made it to the first list of the 2025 SLST exam, moved high court to restore her SC status even if she was upgraded to general category.SSC senior counsel Kalyan Bandyopadhyay sought HC’s permission to upgrade the candidate to the general category contending that another SC candidate with lower marks would miss the opportunity of being considered if the petitioner wanted to restore her status. Bandyopadhyay argued that the idea of reservation was meant for the welfare of a community and not for an individual.Justice Amrita Sinha, however, noted that the petitioner had marked herself as a reserved category candidate while filling the form and had submitted Rs 200, a fee meant for that category. The judge referred to her Nov 27 order, in which the court had held that once a candidate’s category was final, authorities could not “change it suo motu”.





Source link

Don’t need anything for myself, give jobs to my sons: Mathura | Nagpur News



NAGPUR: Half a century passed bearing a trauma that had revolutionised anti-rape laws in India and saved thousands of identities from being exposed to shame, but when TOI’s story on her plight put her back on the spotlight, Mathura forgot about her hardship and sought help for her two sons.On Tuesday, when Chandrapur district collector Vinay Gowda stepped into her ramshackle home in a tiny hamlet in east Maharashtra and wanted to know how he could help her, she demanded nothing, only jobs for her sons.Gowda and his team, surprised by her selflessness, have now begun planning contractual openings or business grants for her sons. “The younger of the two seemed proactive. We can think of helping him start a shop or a goat-rearing business,” said Gowda, who handed over a cheque of Rs8 lakh to Mathura. The cheque was given to the bank manager, who was in Gowda’s team.“The cheque has been deposited and a fixed deposit opened, which would need the tehsildar’s nod to encash. She would now get Rs5,000 per month as interest,” said Gowda, who reached Mathura’s home amid his tight schedule on a polling day in the district.Gowda further stated the govt would extend a grant under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana to build a home at the same place, where Mathura lives. The gram panchayat would carry out the construction, said the collector, who also deputed a person to coordinate and monitor her requirements.Gowda stated he’s also contemplating helping Mathura get land under a scheme for the tribal population. “Up to Rs 20 lakh grant can be allocated for 3-4 acres of land,” said the collector, adding her ration card has been updated to ensure 30kg of grains, while benefits under the Niradhar Yojana would resume too.Mathura’s custodial rape in 1972 triggered nationwide protests and ushered legal reforms. The fire was rekindled by the outgoing Chief Justice of India, BR Gavai, during a speech at a lecture series in Delhi.TOI’s story on Mathura’s impoverished life paved the way for nationwide concern and help poured in from various corners of the country. Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis also took cognisance and showed keenness to help.





Source link

Stop SC benefits to converted christians, HC instructs UP | India News


Stop SC benefits to converted christians, HC instructs UP

PRAYAGRAJ: Allahabad high court has directed the Uttar Pradesh govt to ensure that anyone who converts to Christianity automatically forfeits all Scheduled Caste benefits, failing which it would be construed as a “fraud on the Constitution and contrary to the ethos of reservation policies”.Justice Praveen Kumar Giri’s Nov 21 order cites Paragraph 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, specifying that nobody other than a Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist can be deemed a member of an Scheduled Caste community.The court directed the principal secretary of the minorities welfare department to take appropriate steps to ensure that the distinction between minority and SC status was strictly enforced.The court said retention of SC status after conversion would amount to fraudulently claiming benefits since there is no caste system in Christianity.It fixed a timeline of four months for all district magistrates to act in accordance with the law to identify and prevent such occurrences.Justice Giri passed the order while dismissing a plea filed by a man accused of “mocking Hindu deities” and promoting enmity.The appellant, Jitendra Sahani, had petitioned the court to quash the charge sheet in the case on the ground that he had sought permission from the authorities to “preach the words of Jesus Christ on my land”.Justice Giri noted that Sahani mentioned his religion as “Hindu” in his affidavit, although he had converted to Christianity.It transpired that the appellant was from the SC community before his conversion.A witness in the case alleged that Sahani ridiculed the Hindu faith by claiming it offered no respect due to caste hierarchies, whereas embracing Christianity would lead to “jobs, business growth and financial benefits from the missionaries”.The court mentioned a recent Supreme Court judgment – C Selvarani Vs special secretary-cum-district collector 2024 – in which the bench held that a person ceases to belong to a particular caste after converting to Christianity.





Source link