File Pic: Pakistan’s Salman Ali Agha, left, with Shaheen Shah Afridi (AP Photo)

Pakistan’s troubles deepened on Sunday after a 2-1 ODI series defeat to Bangladesh triggered fierce criticism from former wicketkeeper Kamran Akmal, who questioned the state of the country’s cricket with a scathing remark: “If you don’t beat teams in matches, will you now steal ICC trophies and bring them home?”Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!The outburst came after Bangladesh edged Pakistan by 11 runs in the third and final ODI at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium in Dhaka to seal the series. The defeat compounds Pakistan’s struggles following their disappointing early exit from the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup.Bangladesh posted 290 for five after being asked to bat, powered by a superb century from Tanzid Hasan. The opener struck a fluent 107 off 98 balls, hitting six fours and seven sixes, and shared a 105-run stand with Saif Hassan, who made 36. Later contributions from Litton Das (41) and Towhid Hridoy (48) ensured the hosts set a challenging target.Pakistan’s bowling effort was led by Haris Rauf, who claimed three wickets, while captain Shaheen Shah Afridi and spinner Abrar Ahmed took one each.Chasing 291, Pakistan were rocked early and slumped to 82 for five before Salman Ali Agha mounted a spirited counterattack. Agha smashed 106 off 98 balls to keep Pakistan in the hunt, but his dismissal in the 48th over proved decisive as the visitors were bowled out for 279 off the final delivery.Taskin Ahmed starred with the ball for Bangladesh, taking four wickets, while Mustafizur Rahman chipped in with three.Reacting to the defeat on a television show, Akmal launched a blistering attack on Pakistan cricket’s administration and decision-making.“The condition is such that now even the Netherlands would want to play a series against us, beat us and get Test status. This is the condition of Pakistan cricket now,” Akmal said.He questioned Pakistan’s tactical choices as well. “It was a good pitch. Why did you choose to bowl first? They could have easily scored 350 today. Litton Das played slowly at the end and still they got 290, yet we lost.”Akmal also took a swipe at Pakistan Cricket Board chief Mohsin Naqvi, referencing the controversy surrounding the 2025 Asia Cup trophy presentation.“For God’s sake, think about Pakistan cricket. You have made a mockery of it. When you don’t win series against teams, how will you progress? If you don’t beat teams in matches, will you now steal ICC trophies and bring them home?”

US President Donald Trump on Monday criticised the US Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate his global tariffs, warning that the ruling could cost the United States trillions of dollars. He said that the verdict will benefit foreign countries and companies that have been “ripping off the United States of America” for decades.” Commenting on his tarrif approach, Trump said that he has the right to impose tariff in another form and is preparing to do so.In a series of posts on social media platform Truth Social, Trump said that tariffs were the most important issue at stake in the case and accused the court of undermining his efforts to protect the US economy. “The decision that mattered most to me was TARIFFS!” Trump wrote. “The Court knew where I stood, how badly I wanted this Victory for our Country, and instead decided to, potentially, give away Trillions of Dollars to Countries and Companies who have been taking advantage of the United States for decades.”He added, “Our Supreme Court has made these Countries very happy but, as the Court pointed out, I have the absolute right to charge TARIFFS in another form, and have already started to do so.”He also warned that the hundreds of billions of dollars some US adversaries want repaid should be seen as a symbol of what he described as years of national decline. “But, not anymore,” Trump wrote, adding that the country had “MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” and would soon be “GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE.”Trump also thanked three justices: Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Brett Kavanaugh, for “for their Wisdom and Courage pertaining to the TARIFF case, and for understanding, in addition to the Law, that our “Unfriendly Competitors” should not be reimbursed and rewarded for the decades of Damage they have caused THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”The US president also used the post to criticise the broader functioning of the court. He claimed that while Democratic-appointed justices tend to vote together, “But Republicans do not do this. They openly disrespect the Presidents who nominate them to the highest position in the Land, a Justice of the United States Supreme Court, and go out of their way, with bad and wrongful rulings and intentions, to prove how “honest,” “independent,” and “legitimate” they are.“In a seperate post, Trump went on to criticise Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, accusing him of mismanaging a renovation project at the Federal Reserve complex in Washington, DC. Trump described the project as “a money pit, and embarrassment to our Country for the whole World to see,” alleging that the costs had spiralled billions of dollars over budget.He further targeted US district judge James Boasberg, accusing him of political bias and calling for him to be removed from cases involving Trump or his allies. According to Trump, Boasberg has shown “open, flagrant, and extreme partisan bias and contempt against Republicans and the Trump Administration.”He argued that the judge’s actions in matters related to Powell and other cases were driven more by politics than law. Trump said the recent tariff decision from the Supreme Court itself was an example of how the court system has become highly politicised, calling the ruling “a GIFT to Countries and Companies who have been ‘ripping off the United States of America’ for decades.”The comments come as the Trump administration ramps up efforts to recover roughly $1.6 trillion in tariff revenue after the Supreme Court struck down several of the president’s import duties, according to a report by the Associated Press.Officials are now exploring alternative legal pathways and launching new investigations in an attempt to impose replacement tariffs. The lost revenue had been expected to help offset the multi-trillion-dollar cost of planned tax cuts.Experts say recovering that amount could prove difficult, as the alternative routes for imposing tariffs involve more complex procedures and allow US companies greater scope to seek exemptions. Meanwhile, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the administration will open investigations into 16 economies, including the European Union, to determine whether government subsidies are encouraging excessive factory capacity that harms US manufacturing. The probe will also examine China, South Korea and Japan.A second investigation will review whether dozens of countries have failed to ban goods produced with forced labour, which Washington views as an unfair trade practice. The review will cover the EU and China, as well as Mexico, Canada, Australia and Brazil.

Sejjil missile launched by Iran towards Israel (Video/X@MOSSADil)

The Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) on Sunday carried out a new round of missile strikes against Israeli targets. For the first time, Tehran launched Sejjil-2 missiles since the outbreak of the US-Israeli war that started on February 28.IRGC carried out the latest wave of retaliatory strikes as part of its ongoing military campaign against Israel, saying that the attacks targeted strategic and military locations inside Tel Aviv.The group further said that the attacks were part of the 54th wave of missile strikes carried out under ‘Operation True Promise 4’, according to state news agency Islam Times. In a statement, the IRGC’s Public Relations Office said that the latest barrage included a mix of ballistic missiles such as Khorramshahr, Khaybar-shekan, Qadr and Emad, along with the strategic Sejjil missile.According to the statement, the Khorramshahr missile, which carries a warhead weighing around two tonnes was also used in the strikes. Iranian officials said the missiles targeted locations linked to Israeli military operations and decision-making infrastructure.The IRGC claimed that sites connected to Israel’s defence industries and areas where Israeli forces were gathered were among the targets hit during the attacks.The missile got its nickname ‘dancing missile’based on its high‑maneuverability and ability to evade defence systems. The missile launch comes amid the ongoing war involving the United States, Israel and Iran that began after large-scale strikes were launched inside Iran.Iran has said the conflict began after American and Israeli forces carried out a military campaign following the killing of the country’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei along with several senior military commanders and civilians.The attacks reportedly included air strikes on both military and civilian sites across Iran, causing heavy damage and casualties.In response, Iran has launched several waves of missiles and drones targeting Israeli territory and US military positions across the region.

What are Sejjil missiles?

The Sejjil missile is one of Iran’s most advanced ballistic missile systems. It is a two-stage, solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) developed domestically by Iran.The missile has a reported range of about 2,000 kilometres, allowing it to reach targets across much of the Middle East. It can carry a single warhead weighing around 700 kilograms, according to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). One of the key advantages of the Sejjil system is its solid-fuel propulsion. Unlike liquid-fuel missiles that need to be refuelled before launch, solid-fuel missiles can be launched more quickly, making them harder to detect or destroy before firing.The missile is also road-mobile, meaning it can be transported and launched from mobile platforms.

Sejjil missile development and history

Development of the Sejjil missile started in the late 1990s, building on earlier Iranian missile programmes such as the Zelzal short-range ballistic missile.The first successful test launch took place in 2008, followed by another test in 2009 aimed at improving the missile’s guidance and navigation systems.Several additional tests were conducted in the following years, including one that reportedly flew nearly 1,900 kilometres.Iran has displayed the missile publicly during military parades alongside other systems such as the Shahab-3 and Ghadr-1 missiles.After about a decade of inactivity, the Sejjil resurfaced in 2021 when Iran launched it as part of the January Great Prophet 15 military exercises.

MUMBAI: The Israel-Iran war will “in the medium term” alter traffic international flows to and from India and also some other parts of the world. When the Gulf carriers, which have a lion’s share of this traffic, are able to resume their pre-crisis schedules remains to be seen. Lufthansa senior VP (sales, distribution and marketing) Frank Naeve says the option of bringing more group airlines to India is being evaluated. At present, only Lufthansa, SWISS and ITA (erstwhile Alitalia) operate here. Speaking exclusively to TOI’s Saurabh Sinha, Naeve spoke about the group’s India strategy and travel trends seen here in the past year shaped by geopolitical realities. Ques. How are airlines tackling the challenges posed by the ongoing was in West Asia?Ans. Airlines are by nature agile in tackling various challenges that keep are coming with unfailing regularity in past few years. Safety remains the priority and with that basic principle, the operations are carried out.Right now our focus is on bringing people home to safety from West Asia and also ensure continued connectivity in the current times. India is especially important to us as it is the second biggest international market for us after the US. We are close to utilising the maximum traffic rights in India. Still (this month we are investing with significant capacity increases by deploying bigger aircraft here given the demand.We have deployed (500-seater) Airbus A380 instead of the (280-seater) A350 between Munich and Delhi, and Mumbai and Munich. There are additional frequencies between Chennai and Frankfurt.Ques. Your partner Air India has also added extra extra flights in view of the demand. How do you plan to grow in the India market going ahead?Ans. As of now only three group airlines — Lufthansa, SWISS and ITA — fly to India. There are others carriers in the group that do not fly here as of now including Austrian, brussels airlines, discover and Eurowings. While these are early days, we are evaluating bringing more of our group airlines here.Our partnership with Air India is progressing well. AI-Lufthansa recently signed a joint business agreement to increase cooperation and further develop our network. For customers, this will mean increased seamless connectivity to an ever growing network with partner airlines aligning their schedules to offer convenient connections.We have a growing staff base in India. Both Lufthansa Technik Service India and Lufthansa Systems have their global capability centres in Bengaluru that together have over 1,000 employees. We bring our latest planes and cabin products to India now including our Allegris business class.Ques. Lufthansa Group enjoys a significant share in the travel market between India and North America. In the last one year, have you seen that demand shrink?Ans. We have seen both way travels demand slacked on India-Canada market in the last few years. However recently (with improvement in ties between the two countries and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney visit to India) that demand has stopped falling and is steadying now.As far as the US is concerned (given visa issues, including for students, with India) the demand for travel to the US from India has been subdued. But that is more than compensated by the spurt in travel out of the US.

S Jaishankar (PTI file photo)

NEW DELHI: India hailed its direct talks with Iran as the “most effective way” to restart shipping through the disrupted Strait of Hormuz, which has affected global supplies, while Tehran allowed Indian-flagged vessels to pass through the route.In an interview with the Financial Times, external affairs minister S Jaishankar praised the direct dialogue with Iran’s leadership, saying, “My talking has yielded some results,” referring to renewed access to the crucial Strait of Hormuz, after Donald Trump called on about seven countries to deploy warships to police the key waterway vital for global energy markets.Follow for live updates on Iran warTrump urged countries such as China, France, the United Kingdom and others to protect the Iran-controlled waterway as “their own territory”. His demand comes as governments, hit by surging energy prices after Tehran closed the route, weigh their options — including talks with Iran or possible military involvement that could risk dragging them into the spiralling Middle East conflict.Jaishankar told Financial Times that negotiations between New Delhi and Tehran, which allowed two Indian-flagged gas tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, showed what diplomacy could achieve.“I am at the moment engaged in talking to them and my talking has yielded some results,” he said in the FT interview. “This is ongoing. If it is yielding results for me, I would naturally continue to look at it.”Jaishankar also outlined India’s approach to handling the crisis and indirectly suggested a similar path for other countries. “Certainly, from India’s perspective, it is better that we reason and we co-ordinate and we get a solution than we don’t,” he said. “So if that sort of allows other people to engage, I think the world is better off for it.”Oil prices closed above $100 last week for the first time since August 2022, with some industry analysts expecting further increases as the conflict stretches into the spring. Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, said last week that the country’s military would continue to block the narrow waterway, through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas previously transited.France and Italy are among the European countries that have opened talks with Tehran on a possible diplomatic solution that could allow energy shipments to resume.Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told CBS on Sunday that Iran was “open” to countries that want to discuss “safe passage of their vessels”.Jaishankar spoke ahead of his participation in a meeting of European Union foreign ministers in Brussels on Monday, where discussions are expected on whether to expand the mandate of the EU’s Aspides naval mission in the Red Sea to include the Strait of Hormuz. The mission currently comprises three warships from France, Italy and Greece.“Each relationship frankly, in a way stands on its own merits,” he said when asked whether European countries could replicate India’s arrangement. “So now, it’s very hard for me to compare this with some other relationship which may or may not have these.”“I’d be happy to share with [EU capitals] what we are doing . . . I know many of them have had conversations [with Tehran] as well,” he added.Jaishankar said there was no “blanket arrangement” with Iran for Indian-flagged vessels and that “every ship movement is an individual happening”.The veteran diplomat also denied that Iran had received anything in return, citing a “history of dealing with each other . . . which is the basis on which I engaged”.“It’s not an exchange issue,” he said. “India and Iran have a relationship. And this is a conflict that we regard as something very unfortunate.”“These are still early days. We have many more ships there. So while this is a welcome development, there is continuing conversation because there is continued work on that,” he added.

Pakistan have officially raised concerns with match referee Neeyamur Rashid after a controversial Decision Review System (DRS) moment involving on-field umpire Kumar Dharmasena during the third ODI against Bangladesh national cricket team in Mirpur.

The incident occurred during the tense closing moments of the match and has now sparked debate over whether proper DRS procedures were followed before Bangladesh were allowed to review an LBW decision. The hosts eventually won the thrilling contest by 11 runs to secure a 2-1 series victory over Pakistan national cricket team.

DRS controversy erupts during the final over of 3rd ODI

The disputed moment took place on the second-last delivery of the 50th over while Bangladesh spinner Rishad Hossain was bowling to Pakistan’s tailenders. At that stage, Pakistan required 12 runs from the final two balls to complete a remarkable chase.

Rishad delivered a flighted ball on leg stump that spun away from Shaheen Afridi towards the leg side. The on-field umpire initially signalled the delivery as a wide, seemingly ending any chance of an LBW appeal.

However, moments later, Bangladesh opted to review the decision for LBW, which immediately triggered confusion on the field. Replays on the stadium’s big screen showed the ball making contact with the bat before passing the pad, forcing the umpire to overturn the original call.

The sequence left Shaheen visibly frustrated as the match situation suddenly shifted dramatically. Pakistan now required 12 runs from just one delivery.

Pakistan allege replay influenced Bangladesh review

According to reports, Pakistan’s team management formally complained that Bangladesh may have decided to take the review only after watching a replay of the delivery on the stadium screen. Under normal DRS protocols, teams are expected to decide whether to review an on-field decision before any replays are shown to players. This rule exists to prevent teams from using televised footage to guide their review decisions.

Pakistan believe that this process might not have been followed in Mirpur. The replay displayed on the big screen reportedly showed the ball passing close to Shaheen’s bat, which may have alerted Bangladesh players to a possible edge and prompted them to challenge the decision. The visiting side has therefore asked match officials to examine whether the replay influenced the decision to review.

Pakistan have also raised another concern regarding the time taken by Bangladesh to signal the review. According to playing conditions, teams have only 15 seconds to request a DRS review after an umpire’s decision. However, no visible timer appeared on the television broadcast during the moment in question, making it impossible for viewers to verify whether the review was taken within the permitted window. Pakistan’s management has reportedly questioned whether the review exceeded the allowed time frame, adding another layer to the controversy.

Also READ: BAN vs PAK – Mohammad Kaif shares his verdict on Salman Agha’s controversial run-out

Bangladesh clinch dramatic series win

Despite the late drama, Bangladesh held their nerve to complete a memorable victory and seal the ODI series 2-1. Batting first, the hosts posted a competitive total of 290/5 thanks to a brilliant maiden ODI century from Tanzid Hasan, who scored an impressive 107. His knock provided the foundation for Bangladesh’s strong total in front of a passionate Mirpur crowd.

Pakistan’s chase got off to a disastrous start as they slumped to 17/3 early in the innings. However, Salman Ali Agha produced a fighting effort with a magnificent maiden century of 106 that kept Pakistan in contention deep into the final overs. In the end, Bangladesh’s death bowling proved decisive. Fast bowler Taskin Ahmed delivered a crucial spell, finishing with figures of 4/49 as Pakistan were bowled out for 279 in the last over.

The victory marked Bangladesh’s first ODI series triumph over Pakistan since 2015, making the result even more significant for the hosts despite the post-match controversy.

Also READ: ICC punish Salman Agha for his furious reaction after the controversial run-out in BAN vs PAK 2nd ODI

MUMBAI: Ahead of the onset of peak summers, a brisk business season for consumer durables companies, some AC makers are feeling the heat of the West Asia war as restricted supplies of LPG and shortage of petrochemicals are beginning to hit production, industry executives said. LPG is used in processes such as brazing of copper and curing of powder-coating while petrochemicals is key to the manufacturing of polymers which are used in the plastic mechanical parts of AC units. To be sure, there’s no major disruption on ground as of now but if things do not get better, it could be a challenge heading into the season. For consumers who will already be paying more for new AC stock which will hit the shelves around April-May on the back of price hikes, the war led supply crunch could pose an added burden on pockets. “We are facing certain challenges related to production–first is availability of LPG and PNG which are required for certain manufacturing processes in ACs and other product categories. Also, scarcity of petrochemicals. It is causing some disruption in day to day production. We are working with our vendors to curb wider impact,” said Vikas Gupta, MD (operations) at PG Electroplast which manufactures ACs and a range of other white goods for brands. Given the likelihood of an extended summer, Gupta hopes the war will subside by then, helping demand. Temperatures have already started rising in parts of India and some forecasts have hinted at the possibility of El Niño later this year. “Geopolitical tension in the Middle East has started creating some supply-side constraints across certain input materials used in AC manufacturing,” said Kamal Nandi, business head and EVP at appliances business of Godrej Enterprises Group which is working with vendors to optimise procurement strategies and ensure continuity of production. Besides limited supply of LPG, availability of key plastic raw materials like Polypropylene and Polystyrene has been meagre, accompanied by sharp price increases, Nandi said. Epack Durable is looking at alternatives for brazing copper for ACs even though that will push up the cost of production, said MD & CEO Ajay Singhania. There has been no loss in production till now but gas agencies have said that there could be challenges going ahead if supply crunch remains. The company is now focusing on ramping up induction cooktops given the surge in demand, said Singhania. New energy norms have already pushed up AC prices by about 5% with another 8%-10% hike on the back of high commodity costs, said B Thiagarajan, MD at Blue Star. “There is apprehension within the industry about supply challenges,” said Thiagarajan. The vulnerability arises from supply concentration–about 88% of India’s LPG imports come from the Middle East and that equals roughly about 54% of the country’s total LPG demand. “If disruptions continue, the supply gap could be significant,” said Sumit Pokharna, VP, fundamental research at Kotak Securities.

Iran’s economic jugular: Why Kharg Island is a key target for Trump. (AP images)

A small rocky island in the Persian Gulf has suddenly become central to the escalating tensions between the United States and Iran.Kharg Island — located just 15 nautical miles (about 24 km) off Iran’s southern coast — may be tiny in size, but it is one of the most strategically important points in the country’s economy and energy infrastructure.

According to Axios, US President Donald Trump is working to assemble a coalition of countries to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and is hoping to announce it later this week.Why Kharg Island mattersDespite its modest geography, Kharg Island functions as the heart of Iran’s oil export system.Roughly 90% of Iran’s crude oil exports move through a massive oil terminal on the island. Pipelines transport crude from mainland Iran to Kharg, where it is loaded onto huge tankers.The island’s coastline sits close to deep waters in the northern Gulf, allowing very large crude carriers to dock at its long jetties and load tens of millions of gallons of oil. According to BBC, these tankers then sail south through the Gulf and pass the crucial maritime chokepoint of the Strait of Hormuz before heading mainly to Asia — particularly China, the largest buyer of Iranian oil.Because of this role, analysts often describe Kharg Island as Iran’s economic lifeline. The oil revenue flowing through the terminal also provides a key financial stream for the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Why Trump targeted the islandAccording to Donald Trump, US forces struck military installations on Kharg Island, including missile storage sites, naval mine facilities and other defence infrastructure.The strikes were carried out by the US regional command, United States Central Command, which said more than 90 military targets were hit while oil facilities were deliberately spared.Strategically, hitting Kharg’s military assets sends a powerful message without immediately crippling Iran’s economy. Targeting the island is often compared to aiming at Iran’s economic jugular — a signal that the US could severely disrupt the country’s oil exports if tensions escalate.Trump himself warned that the decision not to strike oil infrastructure could change if Iran interferes with shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical energy corridors.Why the oil terminal wasn’t bombedDestroying Kharg Island’s oil facilities would represent a dramatic escalation.A strike on the export terminal could cut off the majority of Iran’s oil revenue, but it could also send global oil prices soaring and trigger retaliatory attacks across the Middle East.Iran has already warned that if its energy infrastructure is targeted, it would respond by attacking oil and energy facilities belonging to companies working with the US.Tehran also retains the ability to launch large numbers of drones and missiles at Gulf infrastructure and shipping routes — raising fears that the conflict could expand far beyond Iran’s borders.

The bigger pictureBy striking military sites but sparing the oil terminal, Washington appears to be signalling both restraint and leverage.Kharg Island’s central role in Iran’s oil exports means it remains a powerful pressure point in the conflict — one that could rapidly escalate the economic and geopolitical stakes if the island’s energy infrastructure becomes a target.

While many tech billionaires are known for lavish homes, private islands or luxury yachts, one gaming executive has spent years quietly doing the opposite. Tim Sweeney, the founder and chief executive of Epic Games, has used a significant portion of his wealth to buy vast stretches of forest in North Carolina. His goal has not been development or profit, but protection. Over nearly two decades, Sweeney has purchased more than 50,000 acres of land across 15 counties, making him one of the largest private landowners in the state.The purchases began quietly in 2008, just as the global financial crisis disrupted real estate markets and forced developers to abandon ambitious resort and housing projects. Sweeney saw a different opportunity. Instead of building on the land, he began acquiring forests and wilderness areas that were at risk of being transformed into golf resorts or luxury communities, with the intention of preserving them for wildlife and future generations.

How Tim Sweeney quietly began buying forests to keep developers away

Sweeney’s conservation effort began during the aftermath of the housing market collapse. At the time, many real estate developers who had purchased land in the Appalachian foothills were forced to sell after financing dried up.Rather than letting those landscapes return to the development pipeline later, Sweeney started buying them himself. One of the most significant purchases was Box Creek Wilderness, a roughly 7,000-acre forest in the Blue Ridge foothills. The area is known for its ecological richness and contains more than 130 rare or threatened plant and animal species.Sweeney reportedly paid about $15 million for the property after the crash, when prices had fallen sharply and there were few competing buyers.

A quiet strategy through a little-known company

Many of the land acquisitions have been handled through an LLC called “130 of Chatham.” Through this structure, Sweeney purchases land and holds it for years while conservation groups or public agencies arrange long-term protection.Eventually, the land is often donated or sold at a steep discount to conservation organisations, state parks or federal agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.According to conservationists, this strategy allows ecologically valuable land to be secured quickly before development pressures return.

One of the largest land donations in North Carolina history

Sweeney’s conservation work became widely known in 2021 when he donated around 7,500 acres in the Roan Highlands to the Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy. The donation is considered the largest private land gift in North Carolina’s history.Carl Silverstein of the conservancy described the impact of the donation in a statement at the time, saying the land would remain permanently protected for wildlife, hikers and future generations.“This extraordinary gift ensures that these remarkable mountain landscapes will remain intact forever,” the organisation said when the land transfer was announced.The Roan Highlands are known for their rare spruce-fir ecosystems and spectacular rhododendron blooms, making them one of the most biologically diverse regions in the southern Appalachians.

Turning temporary ownership into permanent protection

In recent years, Sweeney has acknowledged that rising land prices have made it harder to continue buying new properties. Instead, he has shifted his focus to ensuring the tens of thousands of acres he already owns can never be developed.Through conservation easements and legal agreements with land trusts, the forests are being placed under permanent protection, meaning they must remain preserved regardless of who owns them in the future.Speaking to the News & Observer, Sweeney explained the goal simply:“If you can protect land permanently, it will outlast any one person.”

A billionaire choosing forests over fame

Sweeney’s approach stands out even among wealthy philanthropists. Rather than funding buildings, institutions or public monuments, he has quietly invested in land that will remain largely untouched.His wealth comes primarily from Epic Games, the company behind the global gaming phenomenon Fortnite and the widely used Unreal Engine game development platform. The company’s success has made Sweeney one of the richest figures in the gaming industry, with an estimated fortune of several billion dollars.Yet much of that fortune has been channelled into forests, mountains and wilderness areas that many people may never know he helped protect.

A legacy measured in landscapes

For conservationists, Sweeney’s quiet campaign has helped preserve large stretches of biodiversity across the Appalachian region. By buying land when markets were weak and development seemed inevitable, he effectively removed thousands of acres from the commercial real estate pipeline.Unlike buildings or monuments that age and depreciate, forests grow, regenerate and continue to support wildlife for centuries.And in the mountains and forests of North Carolina, tens of thousands of acres will remain wild largely because a video game billionaire decided that some places should never be built on at all.