Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan

NEW DELHI: The Communist Party of India (Marxist) on Thursday launched a sharp counterattack on Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge over their criticism of the party in poll-bound Kerala, accusing the Congress of targeting the Left for electoral gains while going soft on the BJP.In a strongly worded statement, the CPI(M) said the Congress was reneging on its claim of fighting communal-authoritarian forces and had instead become “a feeder organisation for the BJP.”The CPI(M) Polit Bureau also strongly disapproved of what it called the “provocative statements” made by Rahul Gandhi and Kharge against Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan and the secular credentials of the party.“Such canards are being spread by them to secure cheap electoral gains in the Assembly elections. By targeting the CPI(M) instead of the BJP, the Congress leaders are reneging on their claim of fighting communal-authoritarian forces. The people of Kerala will see through this sinister agenda,” CPI(M) said in a statement.The response came after Rahul Gandhi and Kharge launched a broadside against the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) while kicking off the United Democratic Front’s (UDF) campaign for the Kerala elections from Kozhikode on Wednesday.Gandhi alleged that there was an understanding between the LDF and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the state.“There are actually only two sides fighting here in Keralam. One is the UDF alliance, and the other is the partnership between the BJP and the LDF. The UDF unites people, listens to them, and embraces and empowers them. The LDF and their hidden partner divide people and crush them,” he said while addressing the campaign through video conferencing.He also referred to cases filed against opposition leaders and questioned why similar action had not been taken against the Kerala Chief Minister.Gandhi said he himself had around 40 cases and had been questioned by the Enforcement Directorate for five consecutive days, and alleged that the lack of similar action against Vijayan “despite corruption cases” was evidence of a BJP-LDF understanding.Responding to the allegations, the CPI(M), which is also a constituent of the INDIA bloc along with the Congress, said the Congress should introspect on why many of its leaders in different states had joined the BJP.“It is a well-known fact that the present BJP Chief Minister of Assam held important portfolios in the earlier Congress government. In Tripura, the entire Congress leadership joined the BJP in 2018 in order to defeat the Left Front. Many ministers in the Union government and Members of Parliament belonging to the BJP were earlier prominent leaders in the Congress. The Congress became a feeder organisation for the BJP,” the statement said.The party further accused the Congress of allying with minority fundamentalist forces in the state.“Even in these elections, the Congress is allying with minority fundamentalist forces. The Congress-League-BJP nexus has been exposed in various elections in Kerala, including the recently concluded local body elections,” it said.Kerala will go to the polls on April 9 and votes will be counted on May 4. The Congress-led UDF is seeking to unseat the ruling LDF.

Gujarat Titans’ captain Shubman Gill (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki)

Gujarat Titans captain Shubman Gill has joined the growing list of Indian players voicing concerns over the Impact Player rule in the Indian Premier League, stating that it “takes the skill out of the game.” Gill’s remarks come shortly after similar criticism from players like Rohit Sharma, Hardik Pandya and Axar Patel. During the IPL captains’ meeting held in Mumbai, a majority of team leaders, including Gill, reportedly pushed for a review of the rule, which was first introduced by the BCCI in 2023 and has since been extended until at least 2027. Speaking a day after the meeting, Gill was clear in his stance against the regulation, which allows teams to introduce an extra batter or bowler at any point during a match. “Personally for me, I don’t think there should be an impact player. I think cricket in general is an 11 players’ game and on wickets where we play on the grounds that we play, adding an extra batsman is I think it takes the skill out of the game,” Gill said. He further explained that the traditional balance of the sport is being affected, especially in pressure situations where teams are expected to adapt with limited resources. “There’s a certain skill in the game that you need to have. When you have a certain amount of batters and if a couple of your batters get out, there’s an amount of skill that you need to have to still get the scoreboard moving and get your team to a good score.” Gill also argued that the rule is making matches more predictable and less competitive, particularly on batting-friendly surfaces. “With that one extra player, it’s making the game more one-dimensional and it’s taking a little bit of the skill out of the game. Chasing 180 on a challenging wicket or 160 on a challenging wicket is for me, it’s personally way more exciting than chasing 220 on a flat wicket,” he added. Despite the criticism from several players, the rule is set to remain in place for the foreseeable future, with any potential review expected only after the 2027 season. “It’s gonna be there till 2027. It’s something that we also spoke about in the captain’s meeting yesterday. I understand it makes the game a bit more entertaining, but let’s see. It’s there. It’s up to them what the BCCI is going to do, they’re gonna take their decision, but personally I don’t like it,” Gill said.

Historically, India’s highest monthly purchases of Russian crude have been around 2.0-2.1 Mbd since the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022. (AI image)

Russian crude has emerged as a major player amid the US-Iran war – global crude oil supply is badly affected via the Strait of Hormuz, Middle East countries are finding it difficult to export oil and global crude oil prices have risen dramatically. The situation has had major implications for India – a country that imports almost 90% of its crude oil.There was a time after the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022 that Russia had begun to contribute approximately 35-40% of India’s crude oil imports. Come early 2026, sanctions forced India’s procurement of Russian crude to drop. But March 2026 presents a very different picture.The inflows of Russian crude oil have risen sharply since the US-Iran war began and imports via the Strait of Hormuz were disrupted. In fact, crude imports from Russia are now nearing lifetime monthly highs!The Donald Trump administration has given a 30-day waiver for purchase of Russian crude to keep global oil prices stable. It’s important to note that India has never stopped buying crude oil from Russia, however imports dropped drastically after sanctions on Russian oil majors.

“We source crude from wherever supplies are available, competitively priced and deliverable, and we will continue to do so,” a government source told TOI earlier this month. The source also said that the declaration of a 30-day waiver by the US appears to be for the consumption of their domestic audience.

When India Became A Big Importer of Russian Oil

For decades, India has mainly imported crude oil from the Middle East, especially from countries like Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The decision has been driven by proximity, long‑term contracts and stable shipping routes.After the Russia–Ukraine war began in 2022, Western sanctions pushed Russian oil out of European markets. This is when India started importing large volumes of Russian crude – and a big factor driving this decision was the availability of crude that suited Indian refineries at such steep discounts.This helped India reduce its oil import costs and diversify its supply network. However, in late 2025 and early 2026, India scaled back Russian oil purchases amid US trade negotiations and pressure linked to tariffs and sanctions compliance. In August 2025, the Donald Trump administration imposed a 25% penalty tariff on India for its crude oil buys from Russia. The US called these imports an indirect financing of the war against Ukraine. Within months two Russian crude oil majors, Lukoil and Rosneft, were sanctioned making it difficult for Indian refiners to buy Russian crude, leading to a gradual decline in imports. But that has changed now.

The Re-emergence Of Russian Oil

An analysis by Kpler, a global real-time data and analytics provider suggests that India has so far purchased around 45–50 million barrels of Russian crude since the start of the Middle East conflict. The figure may even be higher, given that April figures are not confirmed as yet. The trendline suggests March procurement is likely to reach around 1.8–2.0 Mbd, which would make it one of the strongest months for Russian crude intake since India began ramping up purchases after the start of the Russia-Ukraine war. This compares with a pre-conflict run rate closer to around 1.0 Mbd, Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining and Modelling at Kpler tells TOI.Historically, India’s highest monthly purchases of Russian crude have been around 2.0-2.1 Mbd since the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022.Hence, the biggest takeaway is that the current spurt in purchases of Russian crude oil is now nearing peak monthly trends seen before India started dialling down on Moscow’s crude. For Sumit Ritolia, what stands out is the speed of the rebound: as Middle Eastern supplies via Hormuz dried up, Indian refiners were able to lift Russian purchases by close to around 0.8–1.0 Mbd, helping cushion the disruption without materially affecting refinery runs so far.Sourav Mitra, Partner – Oil & Gas at Grant Thornton Bharat points out that India bought the most Russian crude in a single month in May 2023, when imports reached about 66 million barrels, 2.1 million bpd. “The recent rise in March 2026 is expected to be as high, at around 60 million barrels. This implies that the ongoing conflict in West Asia has pushed India’s purchase of Russian crude oil closer to its previous all-time high,” Mitra tells TOI.

India vs China: The Russian Crude Factor

Experts note that since China has more reserves, it is structurally less exposed to the Strait of Hormuz oil supply shock.Kpler data and analysis suggests that compared with China, India is currently buying similar to slightly higher absolute volumes of Russian crude in March, depending on the month, but Russia’s role in India’s crude slate has become much more critical in the current environment. China continues to take substantial Russian volumes as well, supported by both seaborne crude and pipeline imports, while India’s recent increase has been more directly linked to replacing lost Middle Eastern barrels. “In other words, India and China remain the larger structural buyers of Russian crude overall, but India’s current surge is more pronounced from a substitution and energy-security standpoint,” says Sumit Ritolia.India usually imports 5-5.5 million bpd of crude oil vis-à-vis China’s import of about 11 million bpd.Sourav Mitra says that in 2025, China ramped up crude oil imports to 11.5 million bpd to augment its stockpiles. Russia accounted for 18% of total Chinese crude oil imports in 2025. China’s import of Russian seaborne crude oil surged to almost 2 million bpd in February as India scaled back the import of Russian Urals in February. In the first two months of 2026 alone, Russia’s shipments of crude to China rose about 40 % y-o-y.“Since oil prices are high and China has enough inventory, it’s likely to cut its oil purchases. Shifting of sanctions policies and rising demand from other countries could moderate Russia’s shipments to China in the coming months. However, Russian oil may remain one of China’s preferred choices due to the stability and scale it provides in uncertain times,” he says.

India’s Energy Security & Resilience

India remains structurally exposed to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, having historically sourced around 50% of its crude imports via the route. The ongoing conflict has therefore impacted both crude and LPG flows into the country. “Since the US eased restrictions on incremental purchases of Russian crude, Indian refiners have significantly ramped up intake. Pre-conflict, India was importing around 2.6-2.7 Mbd of Middle Eastern crude which was largely via Hormuz and around 1.0 Mbd of Russian crude. Post-conflict, the flows via Hormuz have sharply declined, but Russian imports have increased to around 1.9–2.0 Mbd, effectively offsetting a large portion of the disruption,” says Sumit Ritolia.Also, as Kpler notes, Middle Eastern producers are partially rerouting supplies via pipelines that bypass Hormuz. The most notable is Saudi Arabia’s East-West (Yanbu) pipeline and the UAE’s Habshan–Fujairah pipeline. These flows have provided incremental relief, allowing India to continue sourcing some volumes from the region despite maritime constraints.

Overall, India’s total crude imports are currently down by around 800 kbd as of date compared to January or February 2026 levels. However, according to Kpler this has not yet materially impacted refinery runs, which remain broadly stable. Refiners have drawn down commercial inventories (excluding strategic petroleum reserves) to sustain throughput, while product exports continue to track near historical norms. What seems to be working in India’s favour is its diversified crude import basket. As PM Narendra Modi said in Parliament: In the last 11 years the number of countries from which India gets oil has increased from 27 to over 40.“Despite the situation at the Strait of Hormuz, India is today receiving more crude oil from its 41-plus suppliers across the world than what was previously arriving through the Straits. High volumes available in international markets — especially from the western hemisphere — have more than compensated for any disruption. Every Indian refinery is running at over 100% utilisation. Crude oil supplies for next 60 days have already been tied up by Indian Oil companies. There is NO supply gap,” the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas has clarified today.Experts note that the trend of reduced Russian crude since late 2025 has reversed.“With shipping risks rising and Middle Eastern supplies becoming uncertain, Indian refiners have quickly increased Russian crude imports again to ensure energy security and uninterrupted refinery operations. The crude procurement is well diversified with supplies coming from US, Venezuela and West African countries,” says Sourav Mitra.Looking ahead, Russian crude is expected to remain the backbone of India’s import slate, with March likely marking one of the highest intake months since June 2025, Ritolia tells TOI. This trend is expected to continue into April, he says.The expert also points to potential for opportunistic purchases of Iranian barrels, particularly cargoes that are already on water, although no significant flows to India have been observed yet in vessel tracking data. Also, India is expected to start receiving Venezuelan barrels from April onwards, and that would help to arrest some of the crude supply risk, he adds.However, despite resilience so far, some moderation in refinery throughput is emerging, with runs estimated to decline by around 5–8% going forward, with crude runs around 5.2 to 5.3 million b/d, notes the Kpler expert.“That said, domestic product supply remains well balanced, and India is relatively better positioned than other Asian exporters. With countries like China and South Korea curbing exports, India could continue to play a key role in supplying refined products to East and Southeast Asia,” he adds.To sum it up, experts are of the view that India has managed to cushion the impact of Strait of Hormuz-linked oil supply disruptions for now by increasing Russian crude oil imports.“While some pressure on runs is expected, the system remains resilient, with no immediate risk to domestic fuel supply and continued strength in product exports,” Ritolia concludes.

Damage in Tehran (AP file photo)

Iran on Thursday officially conveyed its reponse to Pakistan on the US 15-point proposal for de-escalation talks, calling it one sided and unfair.“Iran’s assessment is that it is “one-sided and unfair”, serving only US, Israel interests,” reported Reuters quoting a senior Iranian official, confirming that the proposal “was ​reviewed in detail on ⁠Wednesday night ‌by senior Iranian ​officials ​and the representative of ⁠Iran’s Supreme Leader”.The official further criticised the US proposal, arguing that it effectively asks Iran to give up its defensive capabilities without offering a clear or credible pathway for sanctions relief. “In brief, the proposal suggests that Iran would relinquish its ability to defend itself in exchange for a vague plan to lift sanctions,” he said, adding that the ‌proposal lacked the minimum requirements for success.He further indicated that diplomatic engagement remains distant, noting the absence of any concrete framework for talks.He said there was “still no arrangement for ⁠negotiations, and no plan for talks appears realistic at this stage”, while Turkey and Pakistan were trying to help “establish common ground between Iran and the United States and reduce differences”.This comes a day after Iran had already publicly rejected US 15-point proposal on possible de-escalation talks in Pakistan or turkey, countering with their own 5 demands. Iran had said that any ceasefire will happen only on its own terms and timeline.It laid out key conditions, including a halt to attacks, guarantees against future conflict, war reparations, and recognition of its rights over the Strait of Hormuz, while ruling out negotiations until these are met.Meanwhile, the US proposal included curbs on Iran’s nuclear and missile programmes in exchange for sanctions relief, but Iran has dismissed it as unrealistic on Wednesday too. With continued strikes between Iran and Israel and disruptions to global energy flows, the situation remains tense.

Mumbai: Bombay high court has directed the railways to grant Rs 80,000 compensation to a man who fell off a running train while sitting near the door.The Central Railway said no compensation could be awarded as it was a “self-inflicted injury”, which under the rules excludes compensation.The passenger, Rohidas Kumavat, was travelling by Guwahati Express train from Manmad to Jalgaon. When the train was entering Jalgaon station, he said, “due to the rush, his hands slipped” and he fell from the running train, leading to a head and shoulder injury. The train had no halt at Jalgaon.Justice Jitendra Jain, said long-distance trains have no display board about halts, “if a person boards a train and train does not have halt at the railway station where he wants to de-board, no fault can be attributed to such a passenger”.But Justice Jain said, “It is advisable to wait till the train halts at the next railway station and pay necessary fine for travelling beyond the destination for which the ticket was purchased,'” adding, “I am conscious that at that point of time, a human being may take steps to risk the life, but it is at that point of time that test of mental balance is tested. This is required in the larger interest of the dependents of the passenger. The railway authorities should introduce a public announcement system like that in Vande Bharat train, in all the trains to reduce such incidents.'”The Supreme Court said in 2010 if a person sitting or standing near the door accidentally falls down, it would not be a case of suicide, self-inflicted injury, criminal act, etc.The HC said it was possible the passenger thought the train would halt at Jalgaon and, on realising it wasn’t, an attempt to alight would naturally lead to “some injury”.Justice Jain said he could have waited for the next railway station to de-board the moving train, but at that point of time, a person loses his mental balance and in panic tries to de-board the moving train without there being any intention of “self-inflicted injury”.“No person in such a situation would do any act to impose upon him ‘self-inflicted injury’ and in some cases, it is also possible that he may go unscathed,” added the HC.

NEW DELHI: The final rites of Harish Rana, the first individual in India to be legally granted passive euthanasia, were performed in the national capital following his death at All India Institute of Medical Sciences.The family donated his corneas and heart valves, according to news agency ANI.