Breaking News
India name squads for Thomas, Uber Cup; Lakshya Sen, PV Sindhu set to headline | Badminton News


India name squads for Thomas, Uber Cup; Lakshya Sen, PV Sindhu set to headline
Lakshya Sen and PV Sindhu (Photos by PTI)

NEW DELHI: India have announced their squads for the upcoming Thomas and Uber Cup, with a mix of experienced stars and young talent set to compete in Denmark next month. Lakshya Sen, fresh off his All England runner-up finish, will lead the men’s team, while PV Sindhu and rising youngster Unnati Hooda will headline the women’s challenge.The men’s squad largely retains the core group that won the historic Thomas Cup in 2022, including Kidambi Srikanth, HS Prannoy, and the top doubles pair of Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty.

Watch

Bird Poop, Monkeys & Smog: Inside the 2026 India Open Badminton Controversy

At the same time, new faces like Ayush Shetty have earned their spot after impressive performances, while players like MR Arjun have returned from injury to strengthen the squad.The women’s team is built around experienced names like Sindhu and the doubles duo of Gayatri Gopichand and Treesa Jolly, along with a group of promising youngsters such as Unnati Hooda, Devika Sihag, and Tanvi Sharma, who have been performing well recently.Explaining the selection, the Badminton Association of India (BAI) said in a press release: “The selections were based on BWF rankings as of March 10, with the top five singles players and top two doubles pairs making the cut. “Additional inclusions were made keeping team combinations in mind, with players like Dhruv Kapila and Tanisha Crasto earning spots due to their experience across doubles formats.”BAI General Secretary Sanjay Mishra expressed confidence in the teams, saying, “We have a good mix of youth and experience in both teams. The senior players bring stability, and the youngsters are in great form. They’ve shown they can deliver at this level, which gives us confidence going into the tournament.”Thomas Cup line-up: Lakshya Sen, Ayush Shetty, Kidambi Srikanth, H. S. Prannoy, Kiran George, Satwiksairaj Rankireddy, Chirag Shetty, Hariharan Amsakarunan, M. R. Arjun, Dhruv Kapila.Uber Cup line-up: PV Sindhu, Unnati Hooda, Tanvi Sharma, Devika Sihag, Isharani Baruah, Treesa Jolly, Gayatri Gopichand Pullela, Kavipriya Selvam, Simran Singhi, Tanisha Crasto.



Source link

Doctor, hospital staff booked for negligence in Thane after 9-year legal battle | Mumbai News


Thane: The Naupada police have registered an FIR against a doctor and staff of a private hospital for alleged medical negligence that led to the death of a 51-year-old woman in 2017.The woman was admitted to a hospital near Teen Hath Naka on April 16, 2017, after experiencing chest pain, dizziness and profuse sweating. The doctor was reportedly not present in the hospital and no immediate medical examination was conducted.“Despite assurances of diagnostic tests, including an ECG, no such procedures were carried out during the day. The patient was allegedly treated on an outpatient basis and administered injections by the nursing staff without proper evaluation,” the FIR stated. Later in the evening, her condition deteriorated after being given an injection. She collapsed and was declared dead soon after. The matter saw little progress until the complainant approached the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in 2019. In Sept 2025, the commission ruled in favour of the complainant. A subsequent inquiry conducted by the district civil surgeon concluded the patient did not receive appropriate treatment, paving the way for criminal action. Police said a probe began after the case was filed on March 14.



Source link

Is Saudi Arabia calling the shots? Crown Prince MBS urging Trump to keep Iran war alive – report


Is Saudi Arabia calling the shots? Crown Prince MBS urging Trump to keep Iran war alive - report
Donald Trump with Saudi crown prince (Image/AP)

As the war in the Middle East enters its fourth week, a new report has revealed that Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been urging US President Donald Trump to continue military operations against Iran. He described the conflict as a critical moment to reshape the region.According to The New York Times, the Saudi crown prince has, in recent discussions with Trump, pushed for sustained pressure on Iran. He argued that the ongoing US-Israel military campaign presents a “historic opportunity” to remake the Middle East. He has conveyed that Iran poses a long-term threat to Gulf nations and that this threat can only be addressed by removing its current government.These developments come at a time when the conflict has significantly escalated, raising concerns over regional stability, global energy markets and the risk of a prolonged war. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also viewed Iran as a long-term threat, analysts note that Saudi Arabia’s concerns differ, particularly regarding the risks posed by a destabilised or failed Iranian state.Despite these reports, Saudi Arabia has publicly denied pushing for an extension of the war. In an official statement, the government said, “The kingdom of Saudi Arabia has always supported a peaceful resolution to this conflict, even before it began”. “Our primary concern today is to defend ourselves from the daily attacks on our people and our civilian infrastructure. Iran has chosen dangerous brinkmanship over serious diplomatic solutions. This harms every stakeholder involved but none more than Iran itself,” the statement further read.The war has already had serious economic and security consequences for Saudi Arabia. Iranian missile and drone attacks, launched in response to US-Israel strikes, have disrupted oil markets and threatened key infrastructure. The Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global energy supplies, has been severely affected, impacting exports from Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait.While Trump has alternated between signalling a possible de-escalation and hinting at further escalation, he recently claimed in his Truth Social post that there had been “productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities”.Prince Mohammed has argued in favour of stronger action, including targeting Iran’s energy infrastructure and has even suggested the possibility of ground operations to weaken the government in Tehran, according to The New York Times. Analysts also caution that Saudi Arabia faces a complex dilemma. While it may see strategic gains in weakening Iran, it is also vulnerable to regional instability. Past attacks, including a 2019 strike on Saudi oil facilities, have shown the kingdom’s exposure to Iranian retaliation.Saudi Arabia’s broader economic ambitions, particularly its Vision 2030 plan, could also be at risk if the conflict continues. A prolonged war could deter investment, disrupt energy exports and strain financial resources at a time when the country is undertaking major economic reforms.



Source link

‘Kantara’ controversy row: Ranveer Singh is ready to submit affidavit of unconditional apology in court, visit Chamundi temple |


'Kantara' controversy row: Ranveer Singh is ready to submit affidavit of unconditional apology in court, visit Chamundi temple

Even after the release of ‘Dhurandhar: The Revenge’, an earlier controversy linked to Ranveer Singh continues to follow the actor. Last year, when Ranveer imitated the Daiva (Bhoota Kola) ritual—associated with Rishab Shetty’s ‘Kantara Chapter 1’, it drew criticism from sections of the public who felt their religious sentiments were hurt.Ranveer Singh has reportedly told the Karnataka High Court that he is willing to submit an affidavit offering an unconditional apology for his actions. He also expressed readiness to visit the Chamundi temple, in line with the court’s directions.The statement was made during the hearing of his petition seeking to quash the FIR filed against him in the case. During the proceedings, the High Court orally observed that what the actor did (the imitation) was not correct.For those not in the know, earlier Ranveer had approached the Karnataka High Court, challenging the case registered against him over his mimicry of a character from Kantara: Chapter 1. The controversy stems from his imitation of the Chamundi daiva, which drew criticism for allegedly hurting religious sentiments.During the hearing, Justice M Nagaprasanna made strong oral observations about the responsibilities that come with stardom. “A superstar is not ‘ooper’ (above) law. You have no right to hurt the sentiments of people. You, being an actor, have influence on people. Being a superstar, you have to be responsible in making statements. You cannot be loose-tongued at all,” he remarked.Senior advocate Sajan Poovayya, representing Ranveer, argued that the actor had already acknowledged his mistake and apologised promptly. He stated that the remark was insensitive and made in poor judgment, adding that the magistrate’s order lacked proper application of mind.Responding to this, Justice Nagaprasanna underscored the lasting impact of public statements, saying, “I may forget, you may forget, and people may forget. The internet never forgets.”Meanwhile, the complainant’s counsel criticised the actor’s actions, describing them as a “shoot and scoot” attempt, implying a careless act followed by a quick apology.Following the uproar, Ranveer had issued a public apology on social media. He wrote, “My intention was to highlight Rishab’s incredible performance in the film. Actor to actor, I know how much it takes to perform that particular scene the way he did, for which he has my utmost admiration. I have always deeply respected every culture, tradition, and belief in our country. If I’ve hurt anyone’s sentiments, I sincerely apologise.Meanwhile, the actor is currently enjoying the massive box-office success of ‘Dhurandhar 2’



Source link

US stock markets today (March 24, 2026): Dow, S&P 500 & Nasdaq slip as Brent crude climbs amid Middle East tensions


US stock markets today (March 24, 2026): Dow, S&P 500 & Nasdaq slip as Brent crude climbs amid Middle East tensions

US stocks slipped on Tuesday while oil prices resumed their climb, as continuing airstrikes on Iran and fresh missile attacks across the Middle East dampened the optimism that had lifted markets a day earlier.The S&P 500 fell 0.6%, giving back nearly half of its previous session’s gain. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 363 points, or 0.8%, while the Nasdaq Composite declined 0.5%.Oil prices rose sharply amid persistent tensions. Brent crude advanced 3.5% to $103.47 per barrel after having slumped more than 10% in the previous session. Benchmark US crude also gained $2.20 to trade at $90.33 a barrel, while Brent added $1.47 to reach $101.41 in early trade, AP reported.Futures signalled a cautious start to the session. Contracts tied to both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 fell 0.1% before the opening bell, while Nasdaq futures were largely unchanged.Markets remained volatile as military action continued. Airstrikes battered Iran’s capital and Iranian missiles and drones targeted Israel’s Tel Aviv and other sites across the region. With additional US Marines heading to the Gulf and both sides maintaining heavy barrages, concerns over the conflict’s escalation continued to weigh on investor sentiment.The latest developments came a day after US President Donald Trump said the United States had made progress in talks with Iran to end hostilities. He had also extended his deadline for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global shipping route whose disruption has pushed up fuel prices and threatened economic stability.Iran, however, denied that negotiations had taken place. Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said on social media platform X that “fakenews is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets”.Despite the uncertainty, some analysts saw tentative signs of progress. “Still, while there’s clearly a long way to go until some sort of ceasefire is agreed, and peace restored, we do at least seem to have taken the first step towards those ends,” said Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone.Global markets showed mixed trends. In Europe, France’s CAC 40 rose 0.4% to 7,759.97 in early trade, while Germany’s DAX edged up 0.2% to 22,695.54. Britain’s FTSE 100 was largely flat at 9,899.12.Asian equities rebounded more strongly. Japan’s Nikkei 225 gained 1.4% to close at 52,252.28 after earlier losses, while South Korea’s Kospi surged 2.7% to 5,553.92. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng jumped 2.8% to 25,063.71 and China’s Shanghai Composite added 1.8% to end at 3,881.28. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 rose 0.2% to 8,379.40.Investors continued to track developments around the Strait of Hormuz, whose disruption has rattled global energy supply chains. The conflict, which began in late February, has driven sharp swings in financial markets, particularly in Asia where economies are highly dependent on energy shipments through the route.In corporate developments, Estee Lauder and Spanish cosmetics firm Puig confirmed they are in merger talks that could bring together brands such as MAC, Clinique, Charlotte Tilbury and Apivita. Estee Lauder said no final decision had been taken, and its shares were little changed in premarket trading.Separately, Toyota Motor Corp.’s shares rose 0.6% after the automaker announced a $1 billion investment in its Kentucky and Indiana plants. The move is part of a broader plan unveiled in November to invest up to $10 billion in the US over the next five years, as Japanese manufacturers seek to underline their contribution to American employment and economic growth.Markets are expected to remain sensitive to geopolitical developments, particularly any signals on ceasefire prospects, energy supply disruptions and oil price movements in the coming sessions.



Source link

‘Illegal, inhuman’: Iran sticks Spanish PM’s ‘no war’ message on missiles targeting Israel


The raging power centre in Tehran has used Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s anti-war remarks by attaching his words, written in both English and Persian, to a missile aimed at Israel, local media reported, as Iran continues its violent struggle with Israeli-American forces.Images circulating on Iranian media show this striking wartime messaging, highlighting how Madrid’s vocal opposition to the conflict has resonated far beyond Europe.The stickers, written in English and Farsi, carry a quote attributed to Sanchez: “Of course, this war is not only illegal, but also inhuman. Thank you, Prime Minister.”

Watch

‘Will Burn US…’: Iran Reveals 4-Point Punitive Measure As Trump’s 48-Hour Deadline Nears

According to Iran’s semi-official Mehr News Agency, the adhesive labels were placed directly onto missiles launched from Iranian territory toward Israel.Inscribing messages on munitions is not new in this conflict. Earlier this month, Iranian state television broadcast images of soldiers writing messages on missiles, declaring they would continue strikes “until the last American soldier leaves the Middle East,” according to Turkey Today.

Poll

What should be the focus during global conflicts?

The use of Sanchez’s words on Iranian weaponry highlights the unusual position the Spanish prime minister has taken since the US-Israeli military operation against Iran began on February 28. One of the few left-wing European leaders to condemn the strikes as “unjustifiable” and “dangerous,” Sanchez declared in a televised nationwide address that Spain’s position was “no to the war.”



Source link

IPL 2026: DC skipper Axar Patel explains why he is not a fan of ‘Impact Player Rule’



With the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026 set to kick off on March 28, discussions around the controversial Impact Player rule have once again taken center stage. Introduced in IPL 2023, the rule allows teams to substitute a player during a match, significantly altering team combinations and strategies. While some experts believe it has added tactical depth and excitement, others argue it has reduced the role of all-rounders in the game.

The latest voice to join this ongoing debate is Delhi Capitals skipper Axar Patel, who has openly admitted that he is not a fan of the rule, particularly because of how it affects players like him.

Axar Patel explains why he doesn’t like the Impact player rule

Axar did not hold back while sharing his honest opinion on the Impact Player rule. The Delhi Capitals captain made it clear that, as an all-rounder, he feels the rule diminishes the value of players who contribute in both departments.

“I don’t like this rule, honestly, because I am an all-rounder,” Axar said with a laugh.

He elaborated that earlier, teams relied heavily on multi-skilled players who could balance both batting and bowling responsibilities. However, the introduction of the rule has shifted that mindset. According to Axar, teams now tend to pick specialists instead of all-rounders.

“Because of this rule, the team management goes for a particular batsman or bowler, thinking ‘Why do we need an all-rounder?’,” he explained.

Despite his personal reservations, Axar acknowledged the importance of adapting to the rules. “At the same time, rules are rules and we need to follow them. From a personal point of view though, I don’t like the rule,” he added.

Also READ: IPL 2026: How many matches will Mitchell Starc miss for Delhi Capitals?

Expectations high from Axar and Co.

Heading into IPL 2026, expectations are significantly higher for Delhi Capitals, who are being widely regarded as strong title contenders. Unlike previous seasons, the franchise has built a squad that experts describe as “intelligently constructed,” focusing on balance rather than star power alone.

One of DC’s biggest strengths lies in their spin department, with Axar and Kuldeep Yadav forming arguably the most effective spin duo in the tournament. Their ability to control the middle overs and pick up crucial wickets could prove decisive, especially at the spin-friendly Arun Jaitley Stadium.

The batting lineup also appears well-rounded, with KL Rahul expected to provide stability at the top. He is supported by experienced finishers like David Miller and the explosive Tristan Stubbs, giving the side both depth and firepower.

In the bowling department, the presence of Mitchell Starc adds significant bite to the pace attack. With support from T Natarajan, Lungi Ngidi, and Mukesh Kumar, DC possess a versatile bowling unit capable of adapting to different match situations.

Also READ: Delhi Capitals address speculation over Mitchell Starc’s availability for IPL 2026



Source link

Mumbai petrol pump rush triggered by panic buying despite adequate fuel stocks | Mumbai News


Mumbai: Motorists in Mumbai queued at some of the petrol pumps from late Monday evening to fill the tanks of two-wheelers and four-wheelers amid fears of a fuel shortage, triggering panic buying and concern among commuters. However, petrol dealers and official sources said there was no shortage of petrol, diesel or CNG in the city and urged citizens not to panic.Chetan Modi, president of the Petrol Dealers Association, told TOI the rush was caused by temporary payment-related issues at a few pumps and not by any disruption in fuel availability. “There is no shortage of petrol or diesel or CNG in the city. We have adequate stocks and pumps will not dry out,” Modi said.He said dealers had to make advance payments to oil marketing companies to purchase stocks, but because of two holidays and Sunday last week, some dealers could not deposit money on time. As a result, a few pumps could not keep reserve stocks and had less fuel on Monday, shifting the burden to other outlets and leading to long queues.“It’s just that we have to pay advance money for purchasing stocks from oil marketing companies. There were two holidays and Sunday last week. Money could not be deposited on time for a few pumps and therefore they could not keep reserve stocks. A few of them had less fuel on Monday. The burden was on other pumps, which witnessed long queues,” Modi said.He said the situation was expected to ease soon. “The problem will normalise by Tuesday evening. There is nothing to worry about,” he said.A source in the petroleum ministry in Delhi also dismissed concerns over any wider fuel crisis in the state, saying there was no shortage and that adequate stocks were available.Dealers said the rush was largely driven by panic buying and appealed to the public not to indulge in panic buying, stressing that fuel supplies in Mumbai remained stable.



Source link

IPL: When will Kal Somani-led consortium’s Rajasthan Royal buy come into effect? | Cricket News


IPL: When will Kal Somani-led consortium's Rajasthan Royal buy come into effect?

NEW DELHI: As IPL 2026 nears, a major off-field development has taken centre stage, with Rajasthan Royals, the champions of the inaugural edition of the Indian Premier League (IPL), being acquired for a massive $1.63 billion by a consortium led by US-based entrepreneur Kal Somani. Despite the scale of the deal, the ownership transition will only come into effect after the conclusion of the 2026 season, meaning the current structure will remain in place for now.Somani is not new to the franchise, having been a minority investor since 2021.

Watch

Is this India’s best white-ball team? Nikhil Chopra on 2027 ODI World Cup

With this latest move, he is set to take full control, significantly raising the franchise’s global valuation. Known for his strong presence in the American tech industry, Somani heads companies like IntraEdge, Truyo & Truyo.AI, and Academia and has gradually expanded his interests into the sports world through investments and ownership roles.What makes this acquisition particularly noteworthy is the high-profile backing behind Somani’s consortium. Among the key names is Rob Walton, heir to the Walmart fortune and owner of the NFL’s Denver Broncos, widely regarded as one of the wealthiest sports owners in the United States. The group also includes the Hamp family, led by Sheila Ford Hamp, who owns the Detroit Lions and is part of the Ford Motor Company legacy. Somani has long expressed confidence in the IPL’s future. Speaking about his earlier investment in 2021, he had said, “We see huge potential with this investment, and we are excited for the future of the IPL”. His continued commitment underlines a broader belief in the league’s rapid growth.



Source link

Court: ‘Don’t just say ED, ED, ED’: Supreme Court questions West Bengal government in Mamata I-PAC raid case | India News


‘Don’t just say ED, ED, ED’: Supreme Court questions West Bengal government in Mamata I-PAC raid case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned the West Bengal government over its objection to the maintainability of the Enforcement Directorate’s plea alleging obstruction by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee during a January 8 raid at I-PAC, asking what remedy ED officers would have if their rights were allegedly violated.As per news agency PTI, a Bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and N V Anjaria said some ED officers had also moved the court in their individual capacity, raising the issue of whether they cease to be citizens merely because they serve in the agency.

Court asks state to focus on ED officers’ rights

During the hearing, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Banerjee, argued that a petitioner invoking Article 32 must clearly show which fundamental right has been violated.He submitted that the ED officer who filed the writ petition had not specifically pleaded any violation of fundamental rights and said the ED itself was not even a “person” for the purpose of such a petition.At this stage, Justice Mishra told the state to look beyond the agency as an institution and focus on the officers who had also approached the court.“Please concentrate on the fundamental rights of the officers of the ED with whom the offence has been committed. Otherwise, you will miss the point. You can’t forget the second petition which is preferred by individual officers who are the victims of the offence. You will be in difficulty, I am telling you. Don’t just say ED, ED, ED,” Justice Mishra observed, as quoted by Bar and Bench.Bar and Bench similarly reported that the court asked whether ED officers cease to be citizens of India merely because they are officers of the agency.The Court further said “different political parties govern centre and states. If some chief minister of the other side does this in 2030 and 2031 and you come in power in central government and their chief minister does this, what will be your reaction?”

Kapil Sibal says obstruction of statutory duty is not a fundamental rights issue

Sibal argued that obstruction in the performance of a statutory duty cannot automatically be treated as a violation of a fundamental right.He said, “If someone obstructs a police officer, he can’t file a petition under Article 32. He also can’t file a 226 petition. There will be a prosecution launched for the obstruction of violating his right to discharge his functions.”As quoted by Bar and Bench, Sibal also told the court, “Any obstruction in performance of a statutory duty is not in violation of a fundamental right. If someone obstructs a police officer, he can’t file a 32 petition. There is a statutory remedy. Otherwise every police officer will file a 32. We can’t interpret a law in the context of a particular situation and then open a Pandora’s box inconsistent with the basic features of criminal law.He further argued that an ED officer has only a statutory right to investigate, not a “fundamental right” to do so. “He (ED officer) only has a right under a statute to investigate. And violation of that right is not a violation of fundamental right,” Bar and Bench quoted him as saying.

Bench questions whether ED should seek remedy from CM-led state

The Bench also raised a sharp question over the practical consequence of the state’s argument.“If the CM barges into an ED investigation and commits an offence, your idea of remedy for the ED is to go to the state government which is headed by the CM and inform them about it and seek remedy?” Justice Mishra asked.Sibal responded that the court was presuming the Chief Minister had committed an offence. “Your lordships are assuming that the chief minister has committed an offence,” he said, according to PTI.Justice Mishra clarified that the Bench was not making any finding and was only referring to the allegations in the plea.“We are not assuming anything. That is the allegation. Do not mistake us. Every allegation is based on some facts, if there are no facts, there is no need to be investigated. That is what they are praying for, for CBI to investigate,” the judge said.Sibal also argued that if ED officers came across another offence while investigating under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), they should inform the concerned agency — in this case the state government — under Section 66 of PMLA.

Court rejects suggestion to defer hearing due to elections

The Supreme Court also firmly pushed back against a suggestion that the case be postponed because of the upcoming West Bengal Assembly elections.According to Bar and Bench, senior advocate Kalyan Banerjee, appearing for Banerjee, referred to an earlier instance where a judge had declined to hear a matter due to elections.The Bench, however, made it clear it would not entertain such a request.“We don’t want to be party to election, we don’t want to be party to any crime also. We know the timing of the court. We know the timing of the decision,” Justice Mishra said, as reported by Bar and Bench.Kalyan Banerjee also argued that the state’s consent is required for a CBI investigation, though constitutional courts have the power in appropriate cases.

Hearing remains inconclusive, next date on April 14

The hearing remained inconclusive and will continue on April 14.The matter centres on the ED’s plea alleging interference and obstruction by the West Bengal government, including Mamata Banerjee, during its January 8 search at the I-PAC office and the premises of its director Pratik Jain in connection with an alleged coal-pilferage scam.The agency has sought a CBI probe and also challenged the FIRs lodged in West Bengal against its officers.

Case stems from January 8 I-PAC raid in coal smuggling probe

Banerjee allegedly entered the I-PAC office and the residence of its co-founder while ED officers were conducting searches in connection with a money laundering investigation and allegedly removed documents and electronic devices from the premises.She reportedly claimed the material related to her political party. I-PAC has been associated with the Trinamool Congress since the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.The ED has said the searches were linked to its probe into a 2020 money laundering case against businessman Anup Majee, accused of involvement in coal smuggling.The agency alleged that a coal smuggling syndicate led by Majee illegally excavated coal from Eastern Coalfields Ltd (ECL) leasehold areas in West Bengal and sold it to various factories and plants in the state, with a large part allegedly sold to the Shakambhari Group of companies.

Earlier, SC had termed obstruction allegations ‘very serious’

On January 15, the top court had described the allegations against the Chief Minister as “very serious” and agreed to examine whether a state’s law-enforcing agencies can interfere with a central agency’s investigation into a serious offence.It stayed the FIRs filed against ED officials who carried out the raid and directed the West Bengal Police to preserve the CCTV footage of the operation.The court had also issued notices to Mamata Banerjee, the West Bengal government, former DGP Rajeev Kumar and senior police officials on the ED’s petitions seeking a CBI probe.Tthe Bench also questioned where the ED would go if it could not move the Supreme Court under Article 32 or a High Court under Article 226, observing that “there cannot be a vacuum.”

State says ED plea under Article 32 is not maintainable

The West Bengal government has consistently opposed the ED’s move under Article 32.The state argued the searches at I-PAC were not obstructed, and that the ED’s own panchnama showed this.It also contended that an Article 32 petition can be filed only by citizens alleging a violation of fundamental rights, and therefore the ED’s petition against a state government is not maintainable.The state warned allowing a central government department to file a writ petition against a state government could be dangerous to the federal structure.



Source link